linux: 3.13.0-96.143 -proposed tracker

Bug #1618083 reported by Tim Gardner
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Yung Shen
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Tim Gardner
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Tim Gardner
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Trusty
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 3.13.0-96.143 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
derivative-trackers-created: true
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-trusty
tags: added: trusty
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Trusty):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Packages available

Derivative packages from packages here can be worked on, the following tracking bugs were opened for them:
linux-keystone - bug 1618090

Backport packages from packages here can be worked on, the following tracking bugs were opened for them:
linux-lts-trusty (precise1) - bug 1618093

description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 3, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 20, failed: 7
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 3, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 12
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Yung Shen (kaxing) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 65, failed: 35
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 65, failed: 24
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 30, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (i386) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (i386) - tests ran: 20, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 65, failed: 26
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (i386) - tests ran: 65, failed: 26
Revision history for this message
Yung Shen (kaxing) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/trusty/3.13.0-96.143/trusty-proposed-frozen.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote :

USN needed

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 30, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 20, failed: 1
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 65, failed: 26
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 65, failed: 26
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.13.0-96.143

---------------
linux (3.13.0-96.143) trusty; urgency=low

  [ Tim Gardner ]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1618083

  * CVE-2015-8767
    - sctp: Prevent soft lockup when sctp_accept() is called during a timeout
      event

  * MacBookPro11,4 fails to poweroff or suspend (LP: #1587714)
    - SAUCE: PCI: Workaround to enable poweroff on Mac Pro 11

  * 3.13: libvirtd: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x1040d0
    (LP: #1616193)
    - vhost-net: extend device allocation to vmalloc
    - vhost-net: don't open-code kvfree

  * [arm64] nova instances can't boot with 3.13.0-92 (LP: #1608854)
    - Revert "UBUNTU: [Config] CONFIG_EFI=n for arm64"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: Set EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit in x86_efi_facility"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: Add secure boot and MOK SB State disabled
      sysctl"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: Display MOKSBState when disabled"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: efi: Disable secure boot if shim is in insecure
      mode"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI MODSIGN: Import certificates from UEFI Secure
      Boot"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: efi: Make EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE depend on
      EFI"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: Add option to automatically enforce module
      signatures when in Secure Boot mode"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: [Config] CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE=y"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: x86: Restrict MSR access when module loading is
      restricted"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel
      enforces module loading restrictions"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter when
      module loading is restricted"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: Restrict /dev/mem and /dev/kmem when module
      loading is restricted"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: asus-wmi: Restrict debugfs interface when
      module loading is restricted"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: ACPI: Limit access to custom_method"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: x86: Lock down IO port access when module
      security is enabled"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: PCI: Lock down BAR access when module security
      is enabled"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: UEFI: Add secure_modules() call"
    - Revert "x86/efi: Build our own EFI services pointer table"
    - Revert "efi: Add separate 32-bit/64-bit definitions"

  * [Hyper-V] storvsc messages for CD-ROM medium not present tray closed
    (LP: #1590655)
    - scsi: storvsc: Filter out storvsc messages CD-ROM medium not present

  * CVE-2016-3841
    - ipv6: add complete rcu protection around np->opt

 -- Kamal Mostafa <email address hidden> Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:20:51 -0700

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.