linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1680739 reported by Tim Gardner
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Hardware Certification
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Tim Gardner
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Tim Gardner
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Tim Gardner
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: xenial
Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
82 comments hidden view all 162 comments
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Seth Forshee (sforshee)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: removed: block-proposed-xenial
tags: removed: block-proposed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (46.9 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux-hwe-edge - 4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1

---------------
linux-hwe-edge (4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=low

  [ Tim Gardner ]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1680739

  * ADT regressions caused by "audit: fix auditd/kernel connection state
    tracking" (LP: #1680532)
    - SAUCE: Revert "audit: fix auditd/kernel connection state tracking"

  * Miscellaneous Ubuntu changes
    - [Config] updateconfigs to update CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM for ppc64el
      This cleans up behind a Kconfig change that went undetected.

linux (4.10.0-18.20) zesty; urgency=low

  [ Tim Gardner ]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1680168

  * smartpqi driver needed in initram disk and installer (LP: #1680156)
    - UBUNU: [Config] Add smartpqi to d-i

linux (4.10.0-17.19) zesty; urgency=low

  [ Tim Gardner ]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1679718

  * Fix CVE-2017-7308 (LP: #1678009)
    - net/packet: fix overflow in check for priv area size
    - net/packet: fix overflow in check for tp_frame_nr
    - net/packet: fix overflow in check for tp_reserve

  * apparmor: oops on boot if parameters set on grub command line (LP: #1678048)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix parameters so that the permission test is bypassed at boot

  * apparmor: does not provide a way to detect policy updataes (LP: #1678032)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: add policy revision file interface

  * apparmor does not make support of query data visible (LP: #1678023)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: add label data availability to the feature set

  * apparmor query interface does not make supported query info available
    (LP: #1678030)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: add information about the query inteface to the feature set

  * change_profile incorrect when using namespaces with a compound stack
    (LP: #1677959)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix label parse for stacked labels

  * Zesty update to v4.10.8 stable release (LP: #1678930)
    - xfrm: policy: init locks early
    - xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE XFRMA_REPLAY_ESN_VAL replay_window
    - xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming ESN size harder
    - KVM: nVMX: Fix nested VPID vmx exec control
    - KVM: x86: cleanup the page tracking SRCU instance
    - virtio_balloon: init 1st buffer in stats vq
    - pinctrl: qcom: Don't clear status bit on irq_unmask
    - c6x/ptrace: Remove useless PTRACE_SETREGSET implementation
    - h8300/ptrace: Fix incorrect register transfer count
    - mips/ptrace: Preserve previous registers for short regset write
    - sparc/ptrace: Preserve previous registers for short regset write
    - metag/ptrace: Preserve previous registers for short regset write
    - metag/ptrace: Provide default TXSTATUS for short NT_PRSTATUS
    - metag/ptrace: Reject partial NT_METAG_RPIPE writes
    - qla2xxx: Allow vref count to timeout on vport delete.
    - sched/rt: Add a missing rescheduling point
    - usb: musb: fix possible spinlock deadlock
    - Linux 4.10.8

  * [Hyper-V] pci-hyperv: Use device serial number as PCI domain (LP: #1667527)
    - net/mlx4_core: Use cq quota in SRIOV when creating completion EQs
    - PCI: hv: Use device serial number as PCI domain

  * Miscellaneous Ubuntu changes
    ...

Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
1 comments hidden view all 162 comments
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
Displaying first 40 and last 40 comments. View all 162 comments or add a comment.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.