Gateway_less_Fwd: route for compute node IP address is advertised with self as next-hop
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juniper Openstack | Status tracked in Trunk | |||||
R4.1 |
Fix Committed
|
Medium
|
Naveen N | |||
Trunk |
Fix Committed
|
Medium
|
Naveen N |
Bug Description
172.16.3.11 & 172.16.4.11 are the control_data IP addresses of the 2 compute nodes in my setup.
CN advertises the below routes to JUNOS which JUNOS is marking as hidden. If I am not wrong this is because the route destination and next-hop is same.
Not sure if there is any specific reason to advertise these routes by CN to Underlay routers.
root@a2-qfx1# run show route receive-protocol bgp 172.16.2.11 hidden extensive
inet.0: 23 destinations, 25 routes (21 active, 0 holddown, 2 hidden)
172.16.3.11/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
Accepted
Nexthop: 172.16.3.11
MED: 200
AS path: 64512 ?
172.16.4.11/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
Accepted
Nexthop: 172.16.4.11
MED: 200
AS path: 64512 ?
:vxlan.inet.0: 13 destinations, 13 routes (13 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
{master:0}[edit]
root@a2-qfx1#
-[ 0 controller1 1 compute1 2 compute2 3* LEAF1 4 LEAF2 5 S
Changed in juniperopenstack: | |
assignee: | nobody → Naveen N (naveenn) |
tags: | added: vrouter |
summary: |
- 4.1-FABRIC Routing : CN is advertising BGP route updates compute node - control_data inerface IP as both route destination prefix as well as - next-hop to Underlay routers/switches + 4.1-FABRIC Routing : route for compute node IP address is advertised + with self as next-hop |
summary: |
- 4.1-FABRIC Routing : route for compute node IP address is advertised - with self as next-hop + Gateway_less_Fwd: route for compute node IP address is advertised with + self as next-hop |
information type: | Proprietary → Public |
Review in progress for https:/ /review. opencontrail. org/36870
Submitter: Naveen N (<email address hidden>)