Hello Sachin,

I'm using the commit ID 9da9fae96090a299974be5609978c5b05085d6c5 (in
repository https://github.com/juniper/contrail-neutron-plugin).

Strange that you don't reproduce this problem. Edouard Thuleau has also
reproduced it today.

Antoine.

Sachin Bansal <email address hidden> writes:

> Which neutron plugin are you using? I just tried it on the latest build
> and it is working as expected:
>
> root@b4s9:/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/schema_transformer# neutron net-create n1
> Created a new network:
> +-------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> | Field                   | Value                                   |
> +-------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> | admin_state_up          | True                                    |
> | contrail:fq_name        | default-domain                          |
> |                         | admin                                   |
> |                         | n1-7f17c558-84a2-4e4e-be27-dca56775134 |
> | contrail:instance_count | 0                                       |
> | id                      | 7f17c558-84a2-4e4e-be27-ddca56775134    |
> | name                    | n1                                      |
> | router:external         | False                                   |
> | shared                  | False                                   |
> | status                  | ACTIVE                                  |
> | subnets                 |                                         |
> | tenant_id               | 618d3788d8e34d548d5465e668b3ab18        |
> +-------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> root@b4s9:/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/schema_transformer# neutron net-create n1
> \Created a new network:
> +-------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> | Field                   | Value                                   |
> +-------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> | admin_state_up          | True                                    |
> | contrail:fq_name        | default-domain                          |
> |                         | admin                                   |
> |                         | n1-80bac5da-a3e3-45e2-a720-e16a24764313 |
> | contrail:instance_count | 0                                       |
> | id                      | 80bac5da-a3e3-45e2-a720-e16a24764313    |
> | name                    | n1                                      |
> | router:external         | False                                   |
> | shared                  | False                                   |
> | status                  | ACTIVE                                  |
> | subnets                 |                                         |
> | tenant_id               | 618d3788d8e34d548d5465e668b3ab18        |
> +-------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
>
> ** Changed in: opencontrail
>        Status: New => Incomplete
>
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505229
>
> Title:
>   Create two resources with the same name fails
>
> Status in OpenContrail:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   Two networks with the same name in the same tenant can not be created
>   while this is allowed by neutron. This is also true for routers and
>   maybe for some other kinds of resources.
>
>   It fails because fq_name of these two resources are identical.
>
>   For instance, we create a first network 'net-default'
>   $ neutron net-create net-default
>   If we create a second network with the same name
>   $ neutron net-create net-default
>   the following exception is raised:
>   RefsExistError: ['default-domain', 'demo', 'net-default'] already exists with uuid: 9236330e-8f05-49c7-9a5b-f4343e9638af
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+bug/1505229/+subscriptions