| 2016-03-09 07:53:40 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2016-03-09 07:53:40 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
attachment added |
|
vm1_1.pcap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554950/+attachment/4593521/+files/vm1_1.pcap |
|
| 2016-03-09 07:53:58 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
attachment added |
|
vm2_1.pcap https://bugs.launchpad.net/juniperopenstack/+bug/1554950/+attachment/4593522/+files/vm2_1.pcap |
|
| 2016-03-09 07:54:47 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
description |
10.0.0.1 sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
Instead of ARP request packets above, 10.0.0.2 shows ARP reply below. I don't know why 10.0.0.2 sent them without any trigger.
### vm2_1.pcap
"25","2016-03-09 14:59:27.997158","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"28","2016-03-09 14:59:28.997091","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"31","2016-03-09 14:59:29.997098","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
10.0.0.1 sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
Instead of ARP request packets above, 10.0.0.2 shows ARP reply below. I don't know why 10.0.0.2 sent them without any trigger.
### vm2_1.pcap
"25","2016-03-09 14:59:27.997158","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"28","2016-03-09 14:59:28.997091","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"31","2016-03-09 14:59:29.997098","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
|
| 2016-03-09 07:54:53 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
information type |
Proprietary |
Public |
|
| 2016-03-09 07:55:03 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Nobuhiko Nagataki |
| 2016-03-09 08:09:33 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
juniperopenstack: status |
New |
Invalid |
|
| 2016-03-09 08:12:24 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
juniperopenstack: status |
Invalid |
New |
|
| 2016-03-09 08:12:44 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
description |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
10.0.0.1 sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
Instead of ARP request packets above, 10.0.0.2 shows ARP reply below. I don't know why 10.0.0.2 sent them without any trigger.
### vm2_1.pcap
"25","2016-03-09 14:59:27.997158","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"28","2016-03-09 14:59:28.997091","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"31","2016-03-09 14:59:29.997098","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
10.0.0.1 sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
|
| 2016-03-09 08:13:02 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
description |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
10.0.0.1 sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
While pinging, 10.0.0.1 sometimes sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
|
| 2016-03-09 08:15:49 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
description |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
While pinging, 10.0.0.1 sometimes sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
While pinging, 10.0.0.1 sometimes sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
Instead of ARP request packets above, 10.0.0.2 shows ARP reply below. I don't know why 10.0.0.2 sent them without any trigger.
### vm2_1.pcap
"25","2016-03-09 14:59:27.997158","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"28","2016-03-09 14:59:28.997091","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"31","2016-03-09 14:59:29.997098","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
|
| 2016-03-09 08:21:59 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
description |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2.
While pinging, 10.0.0.1 sometimes sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
Instead of ARP request packets above, 10.0.0.2 shows ARP reply below. I don't know why 10.0.0.2 sent them without any trigger.
### vm2_1.pcap
"25","2016-03-09 14:59:27.997158","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"28","2016-03-09 14:59:28.997091","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"31","2016-03-09 14:59:29.997098","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 are located different Compute node. Then 10.0.0.1 was pinging to 10.0.0.2. I captured some packet on both VMs. 10.0.0.1 was vm1_1.pcap, 10.0.0.2 was vm2_1.pcap.
10.0.0.1 sent ARP request which destination IP was set as Unicast MAC address, but 10.0.0.2 didn't receave those packets.
### vm1_1.pcap
"32","2016-03-09 14:59:27.648876","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"35","2016-03-09 14:59:28.648867","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
"38","2016-03-09 14:59:29.648840","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","ARP","42","Who has 10.0.0.2? Tell 10.0.0.1"
Instead of ARP request packets above, 10.0.0.2 shows ARP reply below. I don't know why 10.0.0.2 sent them without any trigger.
### vm2_1.pcap
"25","2016-03-09 14:59:27.997158","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"28","2016-03-09 14:59:28.997091","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
"31","2016-03-09 14:59:29.997098","02:9e:74:56:79:1d","02:da:ec:d1:b6:86","ARP","42","10.0.0.2 is at 02:9e:74:56:79:1d"
However, No25,28,31 packets didn't see in vm1_1.pcap. |
|
| 2016-03-14 10:18:31 |
Hari Prasad Killi |
juniperopenstack: assignee |
|
Divakar Dharanalakota (ddivakar) |
|
| 2016-03-14 10:18:40 |
Hari Prasad Killi |
juniperopenstack: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2016-03-28 11:02:50 |
Divakar Dharanalakota |
marked as duplicate |
|
1550632 |
|
| 2016-03-29 02:54:07 |
Daisuke Nakajima |
attachment added |
|
vm2_ping.pcap https://bugs.launchpad.net/juniperopenstack/+bug/1554950/+attachment/4615488/+files/vm2_ping.pcap |
|
