Use Router instead of Peer when referring to bgp-router object
Bug #1447273 reported by
Nischal Sheth
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Openstack | Status tracked in Trunk | |||||
| R2.20 |
Fix Committed
|
Medium
|
Siva Bavanasi | |||
| Trunk |
Fix Committed
|
Medium
|
Siva Bavanasi | |||
Bug Description
There are 2 different entities in the bgp configuration. First is the bgp-
router object which represents either a control node or a physical router
such as MX. Second is the bgp-peering relationship (link) between 2 bgp-
routers.
UI currently uses the term BGP Peer for both.
Proposal is to use the term BGP Router for the first entity. Referring
to the attachment, the following changes need to be made.
- Rename the entry under Infrastructure from BGP Peer to BGP Router
- The text at the top of the page should also be changed to BGP Router
- When user edits an entry, the title for popup should be Edit BGP Router
- Change "Peer Type" to "Router Type" or just "Type"
| information type: | Proprietary → Public |
| description: | updated |
| summary: |
- Use of BGP Peer is overloaded for 2 different entities + Use Router instead of Peer when referring to bgp-router object |
Revision history for this message
| OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote master | #2 |
Revision history for this message
| OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote R2.20 | #4 |
Revision history for this message
| OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote master | #6 |
Revision history for this message
| OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote R2.20 | #8 |
Revision history for this message
| OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote A change has been merged | #10 |
Revision history for this message
| OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote | #11 |
To post a comment you must log in.
Review in progress for https:/
Submitter: Siva Bavanasi (<email address hidden>)