| 2015-01-30 21:32:09 |
Nischal Sheth |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2015-01-30 21:32:20 |
Nischal Sheth |
nominated for series |
|
juniperopenstack/trunk |
|
| 2015-01-30 21:32:20 |
Nischal Sheth |
bug task added |
|
juniperopenstack/trunk |
|
| 2015-01-30 21:33:13 |
Nischal Sheth |
information type |
Proprietary |
Public |
|
| 2015-01-30 21:33:51 |
Nischal Sheth |
description |
It is typically not desirable to use public ASNs for contrail clusters.
However there is a need to interoperate with an L3VPN core that
uses a 4-byte AS.
Hence the first phase of the implementation would be to handle
received AS4_PATH attribute and prepend our AS to it.. Second
phase would be to use a 4-byte AS as the local AS for the cluster.
Note that 4 byte AS support is not necessary even if the underlay
uses 4 byte ASes as described below. No interaction is required
between the underlay and the overlay.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-00#section-5.2 |
It is typically not desirable to use public ASN for a cluster.
However there is a need to interoperate with an L3VPN core that
uses a 4-byte AS.
Hence the first phase of the implementation would be to handle
received AS4_PATH attribute and prepend our AS to it.. Second
phase would be to use a 4-byte AS as the local AS for the cluster.
Note that 4 byte AS support is not necessary even if the underlay
uses 4 byte ASes as described below. No interaction is required
between the underlay and the overlay.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-00#section-5.2 |
|
| 2015-01-30 21:34:13 |
Nischal Sheth |
description |
It is typically not desirable to use public ASN for a cluster.
However there is a need to interoperate with an L3VPN core that
uses a 4-byte AS.
Hence the first phase of the implementation would be to handle
received AS4_PATH attribute and prepend our AS to it.. Second
phase would be to use a 4-byte AS as the local AS for the cluster.
Note that 4 byte AS support is not necessary even if the underlay
uses 4 byte ASes as described below. No interaction is required
between the underlay and the overlay.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-00#section-5.2 |
It is typically not desirable to use public ASN for a cluster.
However there is a need to interoperate with an L3VPN core that
uses a 4-byte AS.
Hence the first phase of the implementation would be to handle
received AS4_PATH attribute and prepend our AS to it. Second
phase would be to allow a 4-byte AS as the local AS for cluster.
Note that 4 byte AS support is not necessary even if the underlay
uses 4 byte ASes as described below. No interaction is required
between the underlay and the overlay.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-00#section-5.2 |
|
| 2015-02-02 19:16:07 |
Nischal Sheth |
description |
It is typically not desirable to use public ASN for a cluster.
However there is a need to interoperate with an L3VPN core that
uses a 4-byte AS.
Hence the first phase of the implementation would be to handle
received AS4_PATH attribute and prepend our AS to it. Second
phase would be to allow a 4-byte AS as the local AS for cluster.
Note that 4 byte AS support is not necessary even if the underlay
uses 4 byte ASes as described below. No interaction is required
between the underlay and the overlay.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-00#section-5.2 |
It is typically not desirable to use public ASN for a cluster.
However there is a need to interoperate with an L3VPN core that
uses a 4-byte AS.
Hence the first phase of the implementation would be to handle
received AS4_PATH attribute and prepend our AS to it. Second
phase would be to allow a 4-byte AS as the local AS for cluster.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6793
Note that 4 byte AS support is not necessary even if the underlay
uses 4 byte ASes as described below. No interaction is required
between the underlay and the overlay.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-00#section-5.2 |
|
| 2015-04-29 22:52:42 |
Nischal Sheth |
juniperopenstack/trunk: milestone |
|
r2.30-fcs |
|
| 2016-03-21 20:24:08 |
Nischal Sheth |
juniperopenstack/trunk: milestone |
r3.0-fcs |
|
|
| 2018-05-02 23:39:28 |
Ananth Suryanarayana |
juniperopenstack/trunk: assignee |
Nischal Sheth (nsheth) |
Nikhil Bansal (nikhilb-u) |
|
| 2018-07-31 01:54:17 |
OpenContrail Admin |
juniperopenstack/trunk: status |
New |
In Progress |
|
| 2018-08-17 04:13:01 |
Nikhil Bansal |
juniperopenstack/trunk: status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2018-08-17 06:14:29 |
Jeba Paulaiyan |
juniperopenstack/trunk: milestone |
|
r5.1.0 |
|
| 2018-09-21 10:18:16 |
OpenContrail Admin |
juniperopenstack/trunk: status |
Fix Committed |
In Progress |
|
| 2018-09-24 03:45:23 |
OpenContrail Admin |
juniperopenstack/trunk: status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2018-09-24 05:57:21 |
OpenContrail Admin |
juniperopenstack/trunk: status |
Fix Committed |
In Progress |
|
| 2018-10-08 15:29:49 |
OpenContrail Admin |
juniperopenstack/trunk: status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
