Be more explicit when keeping existing infrastructure in sync with config

Bug #1897933 reported by Kenneth Koski
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Canonical Juju
Won't Fix
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

A follow-up to https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1895598

It would be really nice if Juju was much more verbose when it attempts to keep existing infrastructure in sync with the pod spec. Right now, it periodically applies the existing pod spec, and from what I can tell, blindly updating what's there. It would help diagnose situations like the linked one much more quickly if Juju was smarter and had some logging like:

INFO - Found changing in existing infrastructure
INFO - Diff of existing and expected infrastructure:
INFO - <diff>
INFO - Reapplying expected infrastructure

Tags: bitesize k8s
Ian Booth (wallyworld)
Changed in juju:
milestone: none → 2.9-beta1
tags: added: k8s
Changed in juju:
importance: Undecided → High
status: New → Triaged
Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9-beta1 → 2.9-rc1
Pen Gale (pengale)
tags: added: bitesize
Ian Booth (wallyworld)
Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9-rc1 → 2.9.1
Ian Booth (wallyworld)
Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9.1 → 2.9.2
Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9.2 → 2.9.3
Ian Booth (wallyworld)
Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9.3 → 2.9.5
John A Meinel (jameinel)
Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9.5 → 2.9-next
Revision history for this message
Harry Pidcock (hpidcock) wrote :

We are unlikely to make this improvement to the soon to be deprecated pod spec charming.

Changed in juju:
milestone: 2.9-next → none
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.