High memory usage in Kubernetes charms

Bug #1885149 reported by Rui Vasconcelos
12
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Canonical Juju
Confirmed
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

We have been exploring the memory consumption of Kubeflow on top of Microk8s, as we have found Microk8s+Kubeflow bundle too big to fit into a laptop with 16GB of RAM running Mac or Windows.

In our Kubeflow memory analysis:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lzZw2WEf-a2C9orQNjq0y_8WMJ9xbidwE7RTuU0vvTw/edit

we have identified that a big portion of the memory is consumed by juju agents, even when deploying workloads with a residual memory footprint.

Revision history for this message
Rui Vasconcelos (ruivasconcelos) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Pen Gale (pengale) wrote :

Thank you for the detailed analyses!

I think that some of this may be addressed by ongoing work this cycle and next, both refactoring and combining Juju agents, and re-thinking some of how the k8s charms work.

Changed in juju:
status: New → Confirmed
importance: Undecided → High
Revision history for this message
Canonical Juju QA Bot (juju-qa-bot) wrote :

This bug has not been updated in 2 years, so we're marking it Low importance. If you believe this is incorrect, please update the importance.

Changed in juju:
importance: High → Low
tags: added: expirebugs-bot
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.