[feature request] accommodate direct attached storage
Bug #1870423 reported by
james beedy
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical Juju |
Expired
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Hello,
This is a feature request for storage support in Juju for direct attached volumes.
Thanks!
| summary: |
- [feature request] accommodate aws direct attached storage + [feature request] accommodate direct attached storage |
Revision history for this message
| Ian Booth (wallyworld) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| milestone: | none → 2.9-beta1 |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| Changed in juju: | |
| milestone: | 2.9-beta1 → 2.9-rc1 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | Triaged → Incomplete |
| milestone: | 2.9-rc1 → none |
| tags: | added: community-feedback |
Revision history for this message
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | Incomplete → Expired |
To post a comment you must log in.
Would you be able to provide a little more detail of the workflow you want? I assume from the original bug title you were originally looking to do this on aws?