subordinate can't relate to applications with different series
Bug #1776995 reported by
Jason Hobbs
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canonical Juju |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ian Booth |
Bug Description
I'd like the relate a subordinate service, ntp for example, to multiple applications, some of which are on xenial and some of which are on bionic. Since the ntp charm supports both xenial and bionic, it seems like this should be possible, but it isn't:
http://
Instead, I need one subordinate application for each series, which complicates my model and operations.
I think this is also a problem for operating system upgrades. If a subordinate is shared between multiple applications, you couldn't upgrade one of those applications, because all of the applications have to be on the same series.
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | none → 2.5-beta1 |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → High |
description: | updated |
tags: | added: upgradeseries |
Changed in juju: | |
assignee: | nobody → Ian Booth (wallyworld) |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I believe the basis for this is that a charm when stored in the database
has only a single entry for series, not a sequence.
If we updated that, the logic used could be expanded.