Comment 5 for bug 1765719

Sorry was thinking the other bug.
Can you work around this with --map-machines?
So that juju thinks the missing container machine is a specific machine in
the model?

John
=:->

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 19:15 John Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:

> the workaround is to just not mix explicit placement and implicit
> placement. (update the bundle definition)
>
> John
> =:->
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 19:01 David Douglas <email address hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> This is a high priority issue for the customer, so we need to bump this
>> up.
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
>> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765719
>>
>> Title:
>> juju 2.3 incorrect unit placement
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1765719/+subscriptions
>>
>