Comment 2 for bug 1765719

Revision history for this message
Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote : Re: [Bug 1765719] [NEW] juju 2.3 incorrect unit placement

This is due to how the bundle changes are calculated.

It isn't too smart. What it does is looks and sees that it needs three
ceilometers, and it only has two, so it uses the third placement directive.

The code does not yet do deeper analysis to see which of the placements
have been satisfied.