juju assumes bond interfaces named with "bond" prefix

Bug #1692611 reported by JuanJo Ciarlante on 2017-05-22
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
juju
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

As per:

https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/master/provider/maas/interfaces.go#L132
  [...] strings.HasPrefix(children, "bond")
, juju is assuming bond interfaces to be named with
"bond" prefix, which is is inaccurate as Linux interfaces
can have arbitrary names (besides e.g. maas defaulting
to bondX names for bonds).

Couple possible ways to fix it:

$ ethtool -i bond-mgmt
driver: bonding

$ test -d /sys/class/net/bond-mgmt/bonding && echo yes
yes

JuanJo Ciarlante (jjo) on 2017-05-22
description: updated
Changed in juju:
importance: Undecided → High
status: New → Triaged
tags: added: bitesize
tags: added: maas-provider network
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers