can't co-locate nova-lxd with controller services deployed in containers

Bug #1661762 reported by Jason Hobbs
12
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Canonical Juju
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned
nova-lxd
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

21:10 < jhobbs> rockstar: do we need to avoid putting nova-lxd compute nodes on on the same system as juju managed lxd containers?
21:11 < jhobbs> zul: ^^
21:11 < rockstar> jhobbs: there is a bug, currently, where if you put the control plane in lxd containers, and then try to but compute nodes on the same system, the configuring of nova-lxd breaks some things.
21:12 < jhobbs> ok
21:12 < rockstar> This is a well-known bug, and one that we probably need to find some time to address.

Revision history for this message
Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote :

I believe this is a conflict between Juju 2.x and nova-lxd, both needing to configure lxd's storage on the host.

tags: added: uosci
tags: added: lxd
tags: added: cdo-qa-blocker
tags: added: storage
Revision history for this message
Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote :

Please clarify:
1. What version of Juju are using?
2. What version of LXD?
3. What "well known bug" are you referring to?
4. What steps did you follow to reproduce?
5. Do you have logs for your deployment?

Thank you for filing the bug and the conversation snippet :D
Details will help to triage/investigate and address the issue.

Changed in juju:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote :

@Ryan, @Jason,

From Juju's perspective this is a duplicate of bug # 1573681 which also targets Charms Collection.

I'll mark it as such. Feel free to add to the original bug.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.