@Mikko: apologies, I wasn't aware of this bug ID specifically, hence lack of communication. There is a workaround for the 2.1 branch referenced in lp:1640455. We'll look at reverting behaviour so that things work OOTB as they did before.
@Mikko: apologies, I wasn't aware of this bug ID specifically, hence lack of communication. There is a workaround for the 2.1 branch referenced in lp:1640455. We'll look at reverting behaviour so that things work OOTB as they did before.