"juju shares" doesn't make sense any more
Bug #1607608 reported by
Menno Finlay-Smits
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical Juju |
Triaged
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
The "juju shares" command no longer makes sense. Apart from this command, the concept of a "share" doesn't exist anywhere else in Juju. A better name would be "list-model-users", although that's a bit long.
| description: | updated |
| Changed in juju-core: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| Changed in juju-core: | |
| milestone: | 2.0-rc1 → 2.0.0 |
Revision history for this message
| Richard Harding (rharding) wrote | #1 |
| affects: | juju-core → juju |
| Changed in juju: | |
| milestone: | 2.0.0 → none |
| milestone: | none → 2.0.0 |
To post a comment you must log in.
show-model shows the details of users with access to the model and their permission level. I'm +1 on getting rid of list-shares/shares and encouraging users to look at the show-model command instead for those details. We need to update the help around grant/revoke and such to help point out show-model is important for that kind of info much like we had to do with the unregister command.