Charms utilizing block storage fail on LXD

Bug #1603221 reported by Nicholas Skaggs
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Canonical Juju
Expired
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

The issue showing the linked failures can be seen here: http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/issue/5788d733749a5678166b0791

As seen in http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/4136/job/functional-storage/attempt/55#highlight, the test passes in the AWS substrate, but fails inside of LXD by timing out waiting for the agent to come up.

A proper AWS run can be seen here:

http://juju-ci.vapour.ws:8080/job/functional-storage/54/console

Ian Booth (wallyworld)
Changed in juju-core:
milestone: none → 2.0-beta13
importance: Undecided → High
status: New → Triaged
description: updated
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
tags: added: jujuqa lxd-provider storage
Changed in juju-core:
assignee: nobody → Katherine Cox-Buday (cox-katherine-e)
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in juju-core:
milestone: 2.0-beta13 → 2.0-beta14
Revision history for this message
Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote :

This bug also affects CI and prevents a "bless".

Changed in juju-core:
importance: High → Critical
Revision history for this message
Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote :

Last success was July 14, http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/4136

Revision history for this message
Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs) wrote :

Actually, it seems there is no recorded success, since as soon as we transitioned the job to LXD, it looks like it began failing. The earlier successes were on AWS or joyent. If you would like to run the test against an old release of juju (aka, you feel beta3 may work and want data) and need help, let me know.

tags: added: blocker
Changed in juju-core:
status: Triaged → In Progress
tags: removed: blocker
Changed in juju-core:
assignee: Katherine Cox-Buday (cox-katherine-e) → nobody
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
summary: - Charms utilizing storage fail on LXD
+ Charms utilizing block storage fail on LXD
Changed in juju-core:
importance: Critical → Medium
status: In Progress → Triaged
tags: added: feature
Changed in juju-core:
milestone: 2.0-beta14 → none
importance: Medium → Low
Revision history for this message
Curtis Hovey (sinzui) wrote :

lxd does not support block storage. just rootfs ramfs and loop. If CI wants to test storage on lxd, the test needs to be structured to test supported features.

Revision history for this message
Aaron Bentley (abentley) wrote :

The failure does not appear to be related to block storage. The command leading to the failure is is "juju --show-log deploy -m functional-storage:functional-storage /tmp/tmpkDUt55/trusty/dummy-storage-lp --series trusty --storage disks=loop,1G"

Revision history for this message
Ian Booth (wallyworld) wrote :

loop is block storage which is not yet supported by the new lxd provider

affects: juju-core → juju
Revision history for this message
Canonical Juju QA Bot (juju-qa-bot) wrote :

This bug has not been updated in 5 years, so we're marking it Expired. If you believe this is incorrect, please update the status.

Changed in juju:
status: Triaged → Expired
tags: added: expirebugs-bot
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.