initial juju status is really ugly
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical Juju |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Anastasia | ||
| 2.3 |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Anastasia | ||
Bug Description
Immediately after you first bootstrap, if you run juju status, you are presented with this wall of text:
$ juju status
MODEL CONTROLLER CLOUD VERSION
default azure azure 2.0-beta10.1
APP STATUS EXPOSED ORIGIN CHARM REV OS
UNIT WORKLOAD AGENT MACHINE PORTS PUBLIC-ADDRESS MESSAGE
MACHINE STATE DNS INS-ID SERIES AZ
$
From a first use perspective, this is really confusing. It's 2 lines of useful information and then 20 words without any context.
IMO, we should elide the column headers for sections that are empty, maybe with [this page intentionally left blank] placeholders.
$ juju status
MODEL CONTROLLER CLOUD VERSION
default azure azure 2.0-beta10.1
[no applications]
[no machines]
$
---- or ----
$ juju status
MODEL CONTROLLER CLOUD VERSION
default azure azure 2.0-beta10.1
This model is empty. Use `juju deploy` to deploy applications to this model. See `juju help deploy` for more details.
$
| Changed in juju-core: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| tags: | added: usability |
| affects: | juju-core → juju |
| Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | Triaged → In Progress |
| assignee: | nobody → Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) |
| milestone: | none → 2.4-beta3 |
| Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
This PR (against 2.3) no longer displays empty sections and will let the user know that the model is empty: https:/