cmd/juju: version subcommand should report the compiler version

Bug #1258051 reported by Dave Cheney
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Canonical Juju
Expired
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

I would like there to be a way to retrieve the compiler that compiled juju, jujud.

The suggestion is to add this to the output of juju version, something like

% juju version
1.17.0-saucy-amd64 (gccgo)

There are probably some compatability concerns

Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote :

Our experience has been that stable releases aren't really *that* up to date (official releases are roughly 1/month that's a pretty long gap between security updates, etc). What is the goal of avoiding the apt-get update? Just time spent starting up?

Changed in juju-core:
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote :

Sorry, that ended up on the wrong bug report.

I think this would be fine. We could do multiple lines if we wanted to. Or a verbose flag, or a few different things.
What is the specific goal? To have people include the info in bug reports (by default)? Or to be able to ask for the information?

Changed in juju-core:
status: Incomplete → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Dave Cheney (dave-cheney) wrote : Re: [Bug 1258051] Re: cmd/juju: version subcommand should report the compiler version

The difficulty I have now is we're approaching a future where we'll
have tools witht he same version string produced by two different
compiler toolchains. I need a way to figure out which is which when
apportioning blame ^h^h^h bug reports.

I can figure which is which using ldd and chicken guts, but I'd like a
more customer friendly way, especially if we're talking about adding
some kind of 'bug report' script that scrapes up all the bits and
pieces.

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> Sorry, that ended up on the wrong bug report.
>
> I think this would be fine. We could do multiple lines if we wanted to. Or a verbose flag, or a few different things.
> What is the specific goal? To have people include the info in bug reports (by default)? Or to be able to ask for the information?
>
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core
> Status: Incomplete => Triaged
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1258051
>
> Title:
> cmd/juju: version subcommand should report the compiler version
>
> Status in juju-core:
> Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> I would like there to be a way to retrieve the compiler that compiled
> juju, jujud.
>
> The suggestion is to add this to the output of juju version, something
> like
>
> % juju version
> 1.17.0-saucy-amd64 (gccgo)
>
> There are probably some compatability concerns
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1258051/+subscriptions

Changed in juju-core:
importance: Low → Wishlist
affects: juju-core → juju
Revision history for this message
Canonical Juju QA Bot (juju-qa-bot) wrote :

This bug has not been updated in 5 years, so we're marking it Expired. If you believe this is incorrect, please update the status.

Changed in juju:
status: Triaged → Expired
tags: added: expirebugs-bot
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.