| 2011-07-05 23:00:50 |
Adam Gandelman |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2011-07-06 02:13:37 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
ensemble: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2011-07-06 02:15:50 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
summary |
It should be possible to collocate service units |
It should be possible to deploy multiple units to a machine |
|
| 2011-07-06 02:15:55 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
ensemble: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2011-07-06 02:15:58 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
ensemble: milestone |
|
dublin |
|
| 2011-07-07 19:29:03 |
Dave Walker |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Dave Walker |
| 2011-07-08 09:09:52 |
Nick Barcet |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Nick Barcet |
| 2011-07-09 06:07:28 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:~clint-fewbar/ensemble/reuse-machines |
|
| 2011-07-19 15:26:05 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
ensemble: assignee |
|
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) |
|
| 2011-08-11 03:07:51 |
Clint Byrum |
ensemble: assignee |
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) |
|
|
| 2011-08-11 16:33:14 |
Clint Byrum |
ensemble: importance |
High |
Medium |
|
| 2011-08-17 01:19:05 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
ensemble: milestone |
dublin |
|
|
| 2011-09-04 00:05:07 |
Mark Russell |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Mark Russell |
| 2011-09-28 14:37:54 |
Nick Barcet |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Juan L. Negron |
| 2011-09-28 14:58:47 |
Dustin Kirkland |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Dustin Kirkland |
| 2011-09-28 15:26:40 |
Robbie Williamson |
juju: importance |
Medium |
High |
|
| 2011-09-28 15:58:31 |
Clint Byrum |
tags |
|
production |
|
| 2011-09-28 17:39:38 |
James Troup |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber The Canonical Sysadmins |
| 2011-09-30 01:05:57 |
Dustin Kirkland |
summary |
It should be possible to deploy multiple units to a machine |
It should be possible to deploy multiple units to a machine (service colocation) |
|
| 2011-10-01 00:51:41 |
Boris Devouge |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Boris Devouge |
| 2011-10-14 10:34:03 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
juju: milestone |
|
florence |
|
| 2011-10-25 03:22:57 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
summary |
It should be possible to deploy multiple units to a machine (service colocation) |
It should be possible to deploy multiple units to a machine (unit placement) |
|
| 2011-10-27 17:39:30 |
Jim Baker |
juju: assignee |
|
Jim Baker (jimbaker) |
|
| 2011-10-31 20:51:41 |
Jim Baker |
juju: assignee |
Jim Baker (jimbaker) |
|
|
| 2011-12-07 12:10:33 |
Mathias Leppich |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Mathias Leppich |
| 2011-12-13 10:30:00 |
Greg Franklin |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Greg Franklin |
| 2011-12-28 06:16:52 |
Kiall Mac Innes |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Kiall Mac Innes |
| 2012-02-03 11:19:06 |
Vincent Ladeuil |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Vincent Ladeuil |
| 2012-03-05 10:14:50 |
Robin Battey |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Robin Battey |
| 2012-03-16 23:24:05 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
juju: milestone |
florence |
galapagos |
|
| 2012-04-29 01:19:21 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
juju: milestone |
galapagos |
honolulu |
|
| 2012-06-10 20:16:10 |
Cody Krieger |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Cody Krieger |
| 2012-06-19 14:59:09 |
Luis Arias |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Luis Arias |
| 2012-07-04 04:14:36 |
René Schultz Madsen |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber René Schultz Madsen |
| 2012-08-06 09:41:01 |
Dave Russell |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Dave Russell |
| 2012-08-24 05:21:19 |
Pablo Gonzalez |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Pablo Gonzalez |
| 2012-09-10 17:36:23 |
Clint Byrum |
juju: milestone |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
| 2012-09-10 17:36:28 |
Clint Byrum |
juju: milestone |
0.7 |
|
|
| 2012-10-25 09:43:35 |
Clint Byrum |
bug task added |
|
juju-core |
|
| 2012-10-25 09:43:42 |
Clint Byrum |
juju-core: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2012-10-25 09:43:45 |
Clint Byrum |
juju-core: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2012-12-05 03:32:45 |
Dave Cheney |
juju-core: milestone |
|
2.0 |
|
| 2012-12-05 03:58:54 |
Cody Krieger |
removed subscriber Cody Krieger |
|
|
|
| 2013-02-26 10:42:20 |
Marius B. Kotsbak |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Marius B. Kotsbak |
| 2013-03-05 10:48:10 |
Marius B. Kotsbak |
description |
If this is being tracked on another bug, I apologize in advance...
It should be possible to collocate services on the same machine and optionally relate them to one another. This has a very valid use case with regards to openstack. Smaller deployments of only a handful of machines will likely have several (or potentially all) services running on the same machine, while larger deployments will typically isolate services to their own servers and relate them to other services like load balancers, caches, etc.
Currently, the alternative is to develop formulas that deal with a specific set of services as one large service unit and take care of everything within hooks scripts. This is obviously not ideal and makes it difficult to scale.
For example, I'm working on openstack formulas that currently require a minimum of 5 machines:
- nova-compute
- nova-cloud-controller
- glance
- rabbitmq
- mysql
It would be ideal if I could combine rabbitmq and mysql on the same machine as separate services.
nova-cloud-controller is a work-around to this problem as it installs and configures nova-api, nova-schedule, nova-network and nova-objectstore. These should all be handled by separate formulas that relate to one another but currently that would require another 3 machines.
glance is similar in that it sets up the glance-api and glance-registry servers as one unit. |
If this is being tracked on another bug, I apologize in advance...
It should be possible to collocate services on the same machine and optionally relate them to one another. This has a very valid use case with regards to openstack. Smaller deployments of only a handful of machines will likely have several (or potentially all) services running on the same machine, while larger deployments will typically isolate services to their own servers and relate them to other services like load balancers, caches, etc.
Currently, the alternative is to develop formulas that deal with a specific set of services as one large service unit and take care of everything within hooks scripts. This is obviously not ideal and makes it difficult to scale.
For example, I'm working on openstack formulas that currently require a minimum of 5 machines:
- nova-compute
- nova-cloud-controller
- glance
- rabbitmq
- mysql
It would be ideal if I could combine rabbitmq and mysql on the same machine as separate services.
nova-cloud-controller is a work-around to this problem as it installs and configures nova-api, nova-schedule, nova-network and nova-objectstore. These should all be handled by separate formulas that relate to one another but currently that would require another 3 machines.
glance is similar in that it sets up the glance-api and glance-registry servers as one unit.
WORKAROUND: use "jitsu deploy-to" and specify manually the machine to deploy to. Probably requires that charms are not incompatible and that they do not try to use the same ports (e.g. port 80). |
|
| 2013-03-12 13:25:27 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
juju: milestone |
|
0.8 |
|
| 2013-04-21 16:22:39 |
Marcus |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Marcus |
| 2013-06-07 13:57:27 |
Данило Шеган |
juju-core: status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
| 2013-07-02 16:18:35 |
Chris |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Chris |
| 2013-07-12 17:38:37 |
Logan McNaughton |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Logan McNaughton |
| 2013-09-11 21:46:51 |
Tim Penhey |
juju-core: status |
Triaged |
Fix Released |
|
| 2013-09-11 21:47:06 |
Tim Penhey |
juju-core: milestone |
2.0 |
|
|
| 2013-10-01 06:11:45 |
Mathias Leppich |
removed subscriber Mathias Leppich |
|
|
|
| 2013-10-12 03:41:36 |
Curtis Hovey |
juju: status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
| 2013-10-25 19:52:40 |
Manoj Pattanaik |
juju: status |
Triaged |
Fix Released |
|
