lxdbr0 spam in log file

Bug #1598127 reported by John A Meinel
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Canonical Juju
Expired
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

2016-07-01 11:47:04 WARNING juju.network network.go:430 cannot get "lxdbr0" addresses: route ip+net: no such network interface (ignoring)
2016-07-01 11:47:04 WARNING juju.network network.go:430 cannot get "lxdbr0" addresses: route ip+net: no
such network interface (ignoring)
2016-07-01 11:47:08 WARNING juju.network network.go:430 cannot get "lxdbr0" addresses: route ip+net: no such network interface (ignoring)

If we are ignoring it, it doesn't need to be at WARNING level. This seems more a DEBUG level message.

It does seem like once you want to deploy an LXD container, this should be more visible, but it doesn't need to be as part of the standard "filtering LXD addresses" code.

Changed in juju-core:
importance: High → Medium
tags: added: bitesize
Changed in juju-core:
milestone: 2.0-beta12 → none
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
affects: juju-core → juju
Revision history for this message
Canonical Juju QA Bot (juju-qa-bot) wrote :

This bug has not been updated in 5 years, so we're marking it Expired. If you believe this is incorrect, please update the status.

Changed in juju:
status: Triaged → Expired
tags: added: expirebugs-bot
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.