Comment 8 for bug 1280852

Revision history for this message
Kapil Thangavelu (hazmat) wrote : Re: [Bug 1280852] Re: juju specifies obsolete, more expensive, and worse performing instance types on aws

I agree this issue is resolved on trunk and stable series.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:01 AM, William Reade
<email address hidden>wrote:

> --constraints mem=3840 correctly selects an m3.medium -- when multiple
> instance types match constraints, the cheapest is chosen. I'm not aware
> of anything relevant changing between #6 and my check just now -- kapil,
> what exactly are you seeing?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280852
>
> Title:
> juju specifies obsolete, more expensive, and worse performing instance
> types on aws
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1280852/+subscriptions
>