create a machine job for machines/environments that provide local storage

Bug #1229507 reported by Andrew Wilkins
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
juju-core
Won't Fix
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

The local provider, and now the null provider, manage local storage at the bootstrap node. Currently jujud is hard-coded to check if the provider is null or local, and machine-id is "0", and then enable the local-storage worker. We should add a new job to handle this like any other capability.

John A Meinel (jameinel)
Changed in juju-core:
importance: Undecided → High
status: New → Confirmed
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
tags: added: local-provider
Andrew Wilkins (axwalk)
tags: added: manual-provider
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
tags: added: ssh-provider
removed: manual-provider
Revision history for this message
Curtis Hovey (sinzui) wrote :

Dependent on better upgrade story as we need to modify jobs on existing environments.

Changed in juju-core:
status: Triaged → In Progress
status: In Progress → Triaged
importance: High → Low
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
tags: added: manual-provider
removed: ssh-provider
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in juju-core:
assignee: Andrew Wilkins (axwalk) → nobody
Revision history for this message
Andrew Wilkins (axwalk) wrote :

We shouldn't need this in Juju 2.0, because provider storage will not be required at all.

Andrew Wilkins (axwalk)
Changed in juju-core:
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.