[MAAS] Deploy a charm into machine 0 = log loop

Bug #1218199 reported by David Fischer
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1078213: logs are not logrotated. Edit Remove
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
juju-core
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Dear JuJu Team,

The last two days I deployed some charms into a small cluster of 4 servers.

In order to avoid using a 24 threads for only managing instances with JuJu I decided to deploy some services (my own GlusterFS charm) into machine 0.

I checked the debug-log and what I've seen is that the log is appended with old messages again and again.

I opened a terminal into machine 0 to check the logs and what I've seen confirmed my first idea : The file -> /var/log/juju/all-machines.log is growing fast (as fast as my HDD can manage).

I decided to remove this file and create a nice trip, destination unknown, for the log messages : ln -s /dev/null all-machines.log.

I am using the latest juju-core from a raring desktop to deploy charms into precise servers with MAAS. I also upgraded MAAS with proposed repository in order to avoid bug #1204507.

Hope this helps to make this project even better for the good of the community !

Kind Regards,

David

description: updated
Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote :

this sounds like a duplicate of bug #1211147. You mention "using the latest" can you run "juju version" to check what version you are actually running?

You can get the newest stable series from "ppa:juju/stable" though that doesn't have this fix (I believe). You would want "ppa:juju/devel" to test if this bug is fixed for you (it *should* be fixed in 1.13.2 but we've had some trouble reproducing and isolating the bug).

Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote :

If you have this happening right now, getting a copy of all your files in /etc/rsyslog* (.d etc) would probably be helpful.
I also wonder if logrotate might be triggering something. (We say to sync all files except X, but the logrotate causes X to no longer match the ignored list, or something odd like that.)

Revision history for this message
David Fischer (david-fischer-ch) wrote :

Ok, thank you for your quick answer.

I will not upgrade juju-core as my demo must work for the IBC 2013 ... And it is no more room for "new" bugs.
However I am happy that this bug is already fixed.

You are free to change the status of the ticket to duplicate.

Thank you.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.