Comment 3 for bug 1203291

aufs might be a better alternative than overlayfs that should resolve those
issues.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Sidnei da Silva <<email address hidden>
> wrote:

> Seems like overlayfs has issues with not implementing inotify properly
> (LP:882147), which upstart depends on (LP:1124384).
>
> At this point I'm considering to bail off overlayfs and require either
> btrfs or lvm, with a fallback to plain copy instead.
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core
> Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core
> Status: New => Triaged
>
> ** Changed in: juju-core
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Sidnei da Silva (sidnei)
>
> ** Branch linked: lp:~sidnei/golxc/clone-with-backing-store
>
> ** Branch linked: lp:~sidnei/juju-core/lxc-clone-with-overlayfs
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203291
>
> Title:
> local provider moar awesome with lxc-clone
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1203291/+subscriptions
>