Comment 17 for bug 1659229

On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 03:23 +0000, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> I did some review work on the patch, but it feels like it needs
> further attention.  Unfortunately, this was already pretty late in
> the freeze, and now we're past schedule on the release, so I think
> it's best if this patch be left for 0.92.2.  It's a good solid patch
> though and definitely needs inclusion, but better if it not be rushed
> in.

If the updates are just the visual widgets and no functionality, then
having an improved version in 0.92.1 would be good no matter what we do
to make it better in 0.92.2 right?

Is there a down side?

Best regards, Martin Owens