On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Derick Eddington wrote:
> My R6RS bindings checker thought it was implemented because
> it doesn't do the raise "primitive not supported yet" when
> attempting to
> reference the binding.
I figured that's what was happening. Are there any other
inconsistencies that your tool may discover?
> I don't currently need the procedure.
I'll add it anyways since all of its siblings are there already.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Derick Eddington wrote:
> My R6RS bindings checker thought it was implemented because
> it doesn't do the raise "primitive not supported yet" when
> attempting to
> reference the binding.
I figured that's what was happening. Are there any other
inconsistencies that your tool may discover?
> I don't currently need the procedure.
I'll add it anyways since all of its siblings are there already.
Thanks.