recommended version of driver is at the bottom of the list
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
One Hundred Papercuts |
Invalid
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
jockey (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
When opening the Hardware Drivers list, I see three things:
* NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (version 173)
* Broadcom STA wireless driver
* NVIDIA graphics driver (version 185) [Recommended]
With a longer list, the recommended driver can even be out of view and require scrolling. If the last item is the recommended graphics driver, shouldn't it be swapped with the 173 version in position? Also, is the use-case for installing a non-recommended version really strong enough for it to even be present in the UI?
I propose that the order at least be swapped so the recommended driver is first, if not evaluate the value of listing non-recommended versions of hardware drivers.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Sep 27 11:57:10 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS M1330
NonfreeKernelMo
Package: jockey-gtk 0.5.4-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitec
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSign
SourcePackage: jockey
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64
dmi.bios.date: 10/22/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A13
dmi.board.name: 0U8042
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.
dmi.product.name: XPS M1330
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
Changed in hundredpapercuts: | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
status: | New → Triaged |
I'll add a papercut task as I think this potentially qualifies.