Here's how I interpret the "Won't fix" response to this bug: "Whatever we choose as the default place for GRUB could very well be wrong for you because we have no way of knowing your requirements. But we're going to go ahead and put GRUB someplace anyway. And during installation we're neither going to tell you where we put it, nor tell you how to specify some other place. We could just require you to specify where to put GRUB, and that would avoid the entire issue. But we'd rather continue doing something that's always wrong for somebody." At 01:10 PM 1/13/2014, you wrote: >WOW indeed. This bug highlighted a legitimate problem, and all the >attention it got was abusive. >Finally, it got closed five years later with a useless and incomplete comment. > >WHERE grub gets installed is a legitimate issue, and the default is >completely unrelated to >where the BIOS goes looking for boot candidates. The numbering >system for grub's drives >is unique to itself, unrelated to the numbering/naming that Ubuntu >gives to drives after >bootstrapping. Without further assistance, grub will frequently make >an inappropriate choice >and fails to communicate that choice to the user at a time when the >user could have any >useful control over it. For myself, I've taken to installing Ubunutu >on a non-raid drive and >physically removing all raid drives at the time of installation >because otherwise grub >may choose one of the raid drives to install grub, rather than the >drive to which I'm >installing the system. > >Unfortunately, the treatment of this bug report is typical. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Richard Friday >Sent: 01/12/14 02:42 PM >To: