Specify engines to be treated as transactional
Bug #670192 reported by
MikeG
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
holland-backup |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Andrew Garner |
Bug Description
It would be useful to have a configuration option to specify which engines are to be considered transactional when determining whether or not to use --single-
Changed in holland-backup: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in holland-backup: | |
importance: | High → Undecided |
Changed in holland-backup: | |
status: | Incomplete → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
assignee: | nobody → Andrew Garner (muzazzi) |
Changed in holland-backup: | |
milestone: | none → 1.1.0a2 |
Changed in holland-backup: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
Hmm. I was looking at this more in depth and it occurs to me that in these cases I would always set single-transaction explicitly. Is there a good use case where you want to run through holland's engine auto-detect logic with modification but you wouldn't want to simply change the lock type?
Should we always treat the memory engine as transactional for the purpose of mysqldump? I'm not sure that's a good idea either.