2015-12-02 07:33:21 |
huangtianhua |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2015-12-02 07:33:36 |
huangtianhua |
heat: assignee |
|
huangtianhua (huangtianhua) |
|
2015-12-02 07:35:27 |
huangtianhua |
heat: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
2015-12-02 07:35:28 |
huangtianhua |
description |
The bug Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are two errors of the "finally" code:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. |
The bug Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are two errors of the "finally" code:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
|
2015-12-02 07:46:07 |
huangtianhua |
description |
The bug Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are two errors of the "finally" code:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
The bug Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
|
2015-12-02 08:11:11 |
OpenStack Infra |
heat: status |
New |
In Progress |
|
2015-12-02 08:14:32 |
huangtianhua |
description |
The bug Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
The change Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
|
2015-12-02 08:15:07 |
huangtianhua |
description |
The change Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS", when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
The change Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS"(#1492433), when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
|
2015-12-02 08:15:17 |
huangtianhua |
description |
The change Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS"(#1492433), when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
The change Ic948c2fe5baf23c9c4ced33060f672ca9c278a19 "Ensure that stacks can't get stuck IN_PROGRESS"(bug #1492433), when anything wrong happen, if the stack is in IN_PROGRESS, which wants to reset the stack to FAILED, but there are several errors of the "finally" code, such as:
finally:
if stack.state == stack.IN_PROGRESS: -----should be : if stack.status == stack.IN_PROGRESS
stack.set_state(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg) ------should be: stack.state_set(stack.action, stack.FAILED, errmsg)
assert errmsg is not None, "Returned while IN_PROGRESS"
let's fix them. And also I will backport to kilo and liberty. |
|
2015-12-03 14:47:56 |
OpenStack Infra |
heat: assignee |
huangtianhua (huangtianhua) |
Zane Bitter (zaneb) |
|
2015-12-04 01:04:57 |
OpenStack Infra |
heat: assignee |
Zane Bitter (zaneb) |
huangtianhua (huangtianhua) |
|
2015-12-04 02:05:17 |
Zane Bitter |
tags |
|
kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential |
|
2015-12-04 05:43:11 |
OpenStack Infra |
heat: status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
2015-12-04 14:37:17 |
OpenStack Infra |
tags |
kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential |
in-stable-kilo kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential |
|
2015-12-08 10:31:27 |
Sergey Kraynev |
heat: milestone |
|
mitaka-2 |
|
2015-12-15 09:47:45 |
Sergey Kraynev |
heat: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
2015-12-17 08:09:34 |
OpenStack Infra |
tags |
in-stable-kilo kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential |
in-stable-kilo in-stable-liberty kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential |
|
2016-01-21 20:20:23 |
Dave Walker |
nominated for series |
|
heat/kilo |
|
2016-01-21 20:20:23 |
Dave Walker |
bug task added |
|
heat/kilo |
|
2016-01-21 20:21:45 |
Dave Walker |
heat/kilo: status |
New |
Fix Committed |
|
2016-01-21 20:21:45 |
Dave Walker |
heat/kilo: milestone |
|
2015.1.3 |
|
2016-01-21 23:15:11 |
Dave Walker |
heat/kilo: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|