@bruno-bompastor: Thanks for the info, the keystoneclient code should, in theory, support the v4 signing scheme, but the switch to v4 means a completely new code-path in the signing calculation, so at least now we know where to start looking.
@bruno-bompastor: Thanks for the info, the keystoneclient code should, in theory, support the v4 signing scheme, but the switch to v4 means a completely new code-path in the signing calculation, so at least now we know where to start looking.