Comment 6 for bug 582453

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:55:06PM -0000, Will Thompson wrote:
> You're right, it'd be a pain to transition. Maybe it's just something to
> keep in mind for when you next break the D-Bus API anyway?

Actually, we've just broken the api with 0.3 within the last month or
so. We've been recommending external folks use the 0.2 api, so they've
likely not yet gone through the break, and so now is as good a time as
any to change the name. Plus, sounds like this summer we have some
plans to really beef up the dbus command set, so would probably be
preferable to settle the api name itself before then.