Create Unity Control Center so can remain on old GNOME Control Center version
Bug Description
Ubuntu/Unity uses GNOME Control Center as the application to configure the Unity session. We've made a lot of changes appropriate for Ubuntu and Unity (61 patches) which makes it hard to maintain and creates a conflict for Ubuntu GNOME to use the control center. Unity 7 will be replaced by Unity 8 in the future which has a new settings interface.
So we can continue to remain on the current version of GNOME Control Center but allow Ubuntu GNOME to continue to update we will create a new project lp:unity-control-center which is a copy of GNOME Control Center 3.6 but with appropriate renaming so both can be installed.
A number of packages that refer to gnome-control-
A PPA for testing is https:/
Related branches
- Robert Ancell: Approve on 2014-01-15
-
Diff: 93 lines (+11/-12)6 files modifiedREADME (+4/-5)
configure.ac (+2/-2)
debian/control (+1/-1)
debian/copyright (+2/-2)
src/cc-credentials-application.vala (+1/-1)
src/cc-credentials-preferences.vala (+1/-1)
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration) on 2014-02-06
- Alberto Mardegan (community): Approve on 2014-02-06
- Sebastien Bacher: Pending requested 2014-02-06
-
Diff: 488 lines (+81/-73)19 files modified.bzrignore (+4/-4)
Makefile.am (+9/-9)
README (+4/-5)
configure.ac (+24/-24)
data/unity-credentials-panel.desktop.in.in (+4/-3)
debian/changelog (+6/-0)
debian/control (+15/-13)
debian/copyright (+2/-2)
debian/unity-control-center-signon.install (+1/-1)
libaccount-plugin/application-plugin.c (+1/-1)
libaccount-plugin/plugin.c (+1/-1)
online-accounts-preferences.in (+2/-2)
po/POTFILES.in (+1/-1)
po/POTFILES.skip (+1/-1)
src/cc-credentials-application.vala (+1/-1)
src/cc-credentials-panel.c (+1/-1)
src/cc-credentials-preferences.vala (+1/-1)
tests/autopilot/setup.py (+2/-2)
tests/autopilot/unity_control_center_signon/test_control_center_signon.py (+1/-1)
- Michael Terry: Approve on 2014-01-10
-
Diff: 306 lines (+162/-16)12 files modifiedCMakeLists.txt (+9/-0)
debian/control (+1/-0)
debian/rules (+1/-0)
deja-dup/preferences/CMakeLists.txt (+7/-12)
deja-dup/preferences/PreferencesPanel.c (+4/-0)
deja-dup/preferences/deja-dup-preferences.desktop.in (+1/-1)
deja-dup/preferences/gnome-control-center/CMakeLists.txt (+36/-0)
deja-dup/preferences/gnome-control-center/gnome-deja-dup-panel.desktop.in (+1/-1)
deja-dup/preferences/unity-control-center/CMakeLists.txt (+36/-0)
deja-dup/preferences/unity-control-center/unity-deja-dup-panel.desktop.in (+29/-0)
deja-dup/tests/CMakeLists.txt (+7/-2)
deja-dup/tests/deja_dup_autopilot/test_ccpanel.py (+30/-0)
- Alberto Donato: Approve on 2014-01-17
- Adam Collard (community): Approve on 2014-01-16
-
Diff: 13 lines (+2/-1)1 file modifiedapplications/landscape-client-settings.desktop.in (+2/-1)
- Ted Gould (community): Approve on 2014-01-22
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration) on 2014-01-21
-
Diff: 28 lines (+5/-2)2 files modifieddebian/control (+1/-1)
src/desktop.vala (+4/-1)
- Charles Kerr (community): Approve on 2014-01-17
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration) on 2014-01-14
-
Diff: 239 lines (+110/-10)10 files modifiedCMakeLists.txt (+15/-1)
data/CMakeLists.txt (+22/-1)
data/unity-datetime-panel.desktop.in (+13/-0)
debian/control (+14/-1)
debian/gnome-control-center-datetime.install (+2/-2)
debian/unity-control-center-datetime.install (+3/-0)
panel-gnome/CMakeLists.txt (+5/-4)
panel-unity/CMakeLists.txt (+26/-0)
panel/datetime-prefs.c (+9/-1)
po/POTFILES.in (+1/-0)
- Sebastien Bacher: Approve on 2014-01-15
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration) on 2014-01-14
-
Diff: 32 lines (+9/-2)2 files modifieddebian/control (+1/-1)
src/service.c (+8/-1)
- Ted Gould (community): Approve on 2014-01-22
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration) on 2014-01-21
- Sebastien Bacher: Approve on 2014-01-15
-
Diff: 69 lines (+30/-5)2 files modifieddebian/control (+2/-2)
src/backend-dbus/actions.c (+28/-3)
- Ted Gould (community): Approve on 2014-01-22
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration) on 2014-01-21
-
Diff: 30 lines (+7/-2)2 files modifieddebian/control (+1/-1)
src/service.vala (+6/-1)
- PS Jenkins bot: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration) on 2014-02-06
- Activity Log Manager: Pending requested 2014-01-27
-
Diff: 462 lines (+266/-40)10 files modifiedconfigure.ac (+33/-0)
data/Makefile.am (+7/-5)
data/unity-activity-log-manager-panel.desktop.in (+25/-0)
po/POTFILES.in (+1/-0)
po/POTFILES.skip (+12/-0)
src/Makefile.am (+7/-34)
src/alm-cc.c (+4/-0)
src/diagnostics-widget.c (+1/-1)
src/gnome-control-center/Makefile.am (+87/-0)
src/unity-control-center/Makefile.am (+89/-0)
- dobey (community): Approve on 2014-01-28
-
Diff: 13 lines (+2/-1)1 file modifiedubuntuone-installer.desktop.in (+2/-1)
Changed in unity-control-center (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
assignee: | nobody → Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
Alberto Mardegan (mardy) wrote : | #1 |
Iain Lane (laney) wrote : | #2 |
Mmm, yeah, we might be able to use the alternatives system or something to do that. I don't know though --- there would have to be a way to know that the support you want is in the control centre implementation that's going to be called.
Changed in activity-log-manager (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in eog (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in gnome-color-manager (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in eog (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in webaccounts-browser-extension (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in ubuntuone-control-panel (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in software-properties (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in language-selector (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in landscape-client (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in indicator-sound (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in indicator-session (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in indicator-power (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in indicator-bluetooth (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in gthumb (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in gnome-media (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in gnome-control-center-signon (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #3 |
I'd prefer to go for the direct method of doing the full rename rather than redirecting. It appears there's only a finite number of applications that access the control center directly. Also, over time g-c-c and u-c-c are likely to diverge - better to solve the issues earlier than have them crop up in the future. FInally, when we migrate to ubuntu-
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #4 |
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in empathy (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
description: | updated |
Doug McMahon (mc3man) wrote : | #6 |
This will probably preclude users from using both unity & gnome-shell in the same install??, (at least as far as settings panels
While not a big deal, if so I suspect you'll get a number of bug reports from Gs users about not being able to access 'settings'
(if when you fork g-s-d to u-s-d it creates more significant issues in a Gs session then maybe that should be addressed in some manner
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #7 |
> This will probably preclude users from using both unity & gnome-shell in the same install??
no, it's the opposite, it means each desktop can have its version which reduces conflicts (they are co-installable)
> if when you fork g-s-d to u-s-d it creates more significant issues in a Gs session then maybe that should be addressed in some manner
what do you mean? the fork is create to reduce issues in Gs session (e.g allow to drop unity hacks under GNOME and let GNOME use a more recent version than the one that is adapted to Unity)
Doug McMahon (mc3man) wrote : Re: [Bug 1257505] Re: Create Unity Control Center so can remain on old GNOME Control Center version | #8 |
On 12/11/2013 12:11 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>> This will probably preclude users from using both unity & gnome-shell
> in the same install??
>
> no, it's the opposite, it means each desktop can have its version which
> reduces conflicts (they are co-installable)
>
>> if when you fork g-s-d to u-s-d it creates more significant issues in
> a Gs session then maybe that should be addressed in some manner
>
> what do you mean? the fork is create to reduce issues in Gs session (e.g
> allow to drop unity hacks under GNOME and let GNOME use a more recent
> version than the one that is adapted to Unity)
>
Sorry then, I guess I'm missing something.
Atm if I install u-c-c, ect it removes g-c-c so 'co-existence' isn't
possible, that's to change?
These were removed when u-c-c was installed
Removed the following packages:
gnome-control-
gnome-control-
gnome-control-
gnome-control-
ubuntu-desktop
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #9 |
@Doug: that seems wrong, what happens if you try to install both? what g-c-c version do you have?
Doug McMahon (mc3man) wrote : | #10 |
@Seb - I guess it's just caused by the current state of ppa & all will be better when released..
$ apt-cache policy gnome-control-
gnome-control-
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:3.8.6-
Version table:
1:
500 http://
1:
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
That version is not installable due to
gnome-
I've recently build unity-contol-center on my own to test a patch that adds option for always showing the global menu (it also needs patched Unity).
https:/
When I tried to install those packages there was one conflict with gnome-control-
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #12 |
Yes, gnome-control-
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #13 |
> gnome-control-
it seems like the ppa needs to transition to the new gnome-online-
> Yes, gnome-control-
The new g-c-c and u-c-c should Conflicts on gnome-control-
After installing todays packages from PPA I observed several problems.
The icon in the launcher still doesn't launch u-c-c but gnome-control-
The dimensions of the u-c-c are not as they supposed to be and the window is wider but the height remains unchainged from the dafault.
I couldn't use Privacy and Online Accounts settings. When I clicked their icons the settings didn't load only the location bar changed.
When I closed the u-c-c window it opened again and again and again.
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #15 |
> The icon in the launcher still doesn't launch u-c-c but gnome-control-
That's a good point, we are going to need to update the unity config and somewhat change the user configuration on upgrade.
@Robert: that might impact on custom scripts and other things, I'm still not convinced that changing the name is a good idea (without having a wrapper with the old name at least)
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #16 |
> The icon in the launcher still doesn't launch u-c-c but gnome-control-
This is due to the gsettings key /com/canonical/
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #17 |
I've uploaded a gnome-control-
Now the icon launcher starts unity-control-
I've seen on the mailing lists that translations have been imported but apparently not all of them. I checked with my native language which is Polish and u-c-c doesn't have all the translated texts that are in g-c-c. I've made three example screenshots for each of the Control Centers.
http://
There is also a screenshot which shows that when I search in Unity Dash for Privacy settings I get not only the Unity settings but also Gnome. Settings for Gnome shouldn't appear in Dash.
Doug McMahon (mc3man) wrote : | #19 |
Well I see 3 in the Dash - Settings (gnome), System Settings (unity) & Share
Maybe the .desktop for Settings should be OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
and the .desktop for 'Sharing' have a NoDisplay=true line
Changed in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in activity-log-manager (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #20 |
Mateuz - are all the labels normally translated into Polish? As far as I can tell the translations are there, I'm wondering if the language packs are confusing things.
I purged the PPA today and reinstalled it again because you asked for it in mailing list.
Normally the translations are there for this labels in System settings...
All settings
Appearance
but in unity-control-
The rest of the labels display properly in Polish except Text Entry and Backup (which looks different than in 13.10) but that isn't translated normally.
The settings for Online Accounts and Privacy finally work but clicking on the latter results in window becoming to wide and it also crashed.
Changed in gnome-control-center-signon (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Alberto Mardegan (mardy) |
Alberto Mardegan (mardy) wrote : | #22 |
Hi Robert, I linked my changes for gnome-control-
Please let me know how to proceed (I cannot merge my changes to trunk because they depend on unity-control-
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #23 |
Alberto, I made similar changes in lp:~robert-ancell/gnome-control-center-signon/unity-control-center and these are in the PPA - might be worth checking if there are any differences. Sorry, I didn't link the branch to this bug.
I'll update this bug when unity-control-
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #24 |
unity-control-
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #25 |
gnome-control-
Alberto Mardegan (mardy) wrote : | #26 |
Robert, your branch was indeed better than mine (I was not renaming the packages). I just created a MP to integrate a few minor changes from my branch into yours:
https:/
Changed in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in unity-control-center (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in empathy (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #27 |
Alberto - I'm pushing branches that enable panels in both control centers, that way we can land changes at any time and no users will have a control center with bits missing.
It doesn't look easy to do this for gnome-control-
Also, I talked to the Ubuntu GNOME team about what they plan to do with unity-control-
Alberto Mardegan (mardy) wrote : | #28 |
On 01/10/2014 05:24 AM, Robert Ancell wrote:
> It doesn't look easy to do this for gnome-control-
> the package contains a lot of common files. We might have to wait for
> the other components to be ready, and upload the gnome-control-
> signon at the same time we add unity-control-
> make gnome-control-
> uploaded at that time.
OK.
> Also, I talked to the Ubuntu GNOME team about what they plan to do with
> unity-control-
> access the online accounts in GNOME for the apps that need it. Will
> anything show in g-c-c once we move to u-c-c? Do you care about this
> use-case as an upstream?
I wonder whether by "Online Accounts" they meant GNOME Online Accounts
(GOA) or Ubuntu Online Accounts (UOA). The former should indeed be
visible in g-c-c without special support from our side; the latter is
currently visible as well in GNOME, causing two "Online Accounts" applet
to appear in the control center (bug 1040193). Do we want to continue
showing it there as well?
I would prefer if the Ubuntu GNOME session were as close as possible to
upstream, meaning that it would be fine for me if UOA was not appearing
in the GNOME control center. However, this would need at least two
things to happen first:
- If built with UOA support (as it is in Ubuntu), Empathy currently
opens the UOA panel when asked to configure accounts; we should probably
change that to a run-time decision, maybe based on the contents of
XDG_CURRENT_
- Ubuntu's Shotwell build is tightly integrated with UOA, and in order
to publish on Facebook, Flickr or Picasa you need to have a
corresponding account setup in UOA. We should fix this by submitting our
patches upstream, and rework them so that the decision to use UOA can
happen at runtime. Unfortunately this could take several days of work,
and I'm afraid I don't have this time... :-(
Tim Lunn (darkxst) wrote : | #29 |
On 10/01/14 21:23, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 05:24 AM, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> It doesn't look easy to do this for gnome-control-
>> the package contains a lot of common files. We might have to wait for
>> the other components to be ready, and upload the gnome-control-
>> signon at the same time we add unity-control-
>> make gnome-control-
>> uploaded at that time.
> OK.
>
>> Also, I talked to the Ubuntu GNOME team about what they plan to do with
>> unity-control-
>> access the online accounts in GNOME for the apps that need it. Will
>> anything show in g-c-c once we move to u-c-c? Do you care about this
>> use-case as an upstream?
> I wonder whether by "Online Accounts" they meant GNOME Online Accounts
> (GOA) or Ubuntu Online Accounts (UOA). The former should indeed be
> visible in g-c-c without special support from our side; the latter is
> currently visible as well in GNOME, causing two "Online Accounts" applet
> to appear in the control center (bug 1040193). Do we want to continue
> showing it there as well?
No, we ship GOA by default, however we do have users that use UOA
as well (its just not installed by default). there are definitely a sub-set of
apps that only work with UOA, sometimes this is due to Ubuntu patches
, in other cases its just lack of upstream support for those apps.
>
> I would prefer if the Ubuntu GNOME session were as close as possible to
> upstream, meaning that it would be fine for me if UOA was not appearing
> in the GNOME control center. However, this would need at least two
> things to happen first:
Me too, but we can't just rip out the Ubuntu features that have been there
forever, causing regressions and screaming users!
>
> - If built with UOA support (as it is in Ubuntu), Empathy currently
> opens the UOA panel when asked to configure accounts; we should probably
> change that to a run-time decision, maybe based on the contents of
> XDG_CURRENT_
I filed a patch upsteam for that, but it was never merged.
>
> - Ubuntu's Shotwell build is tightly integrated with UOA, and in order
> to publish on Facebook, Flickr or Picasa you need to have a
> corresponding account setup in UOA. We should fix this by submitting our
> patches upstream, and rework them so that the decision to use UOA can
> happen at runtime. Unfortunately this could take several days of work,
> and I'm afraid I don't have this time... :-(
>
Alberto Mardegan (mardy) wrote : | #30 |
On 01/10/2014 01:47 PM, Tim wrote:
> No, we ship GOA by default, however we do have users that use UOA
> as well (its just not installed by default). there are definitely a sub-set of
> apps that only work with UOA, sometimes this is due to Ubuntu patches
> , in other cases its just lack of upstream support for those apps.
Right. So, the gnome-control-
the UOA applet allows building the UOA applet as a standalone
application. Maybe we should package the standalone app in a separate
package, and make it available to GNOME users? In this way, they could
access UOA without having to install the unity-control-
Would this address your concerns?
[...]
>> - If built with UOA support (as it is in Ubuntu), Empathy currently
>> opens the UOA panel when asked to configure accounts; we should probably
>> change that to a run-time decision, maybe based on the contents of
>> XDG_CURRENT_
> I filed a patch upsteam for that, but it was never merged.
Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #31 |
This bug was fixed in the package eog - 3.10.2-0ubuntu2
---------------
eog (3.10.2-0ubuntu2) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/
- Use Unity control center in Unity (LP: #1257505)
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:48:07 +1300
Changed in eog (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in gthumb: | |
importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in nautilus: | |
importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in eog: | |
importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in gnome-media: | |
importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in system-config-printer (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → In Progress |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #32 |
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-color-manager - 3.8.3-1ubuntu1
---------------
gnome-color-manager (3.8.3-1ubuntu1) trusty; urgency=low
* debian/
- Use Unity Control Center in Unity (LP: #1257505)
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:15:06 +1300
Changed in gnome-color-manager (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #33 |
This bug was fixed in the package system-
---------------
system-
* debian/
- Show in both GNOME control center and Unity control center (LP: #1257505)
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:59:34 +1300
Changed in system-config-printer (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in gnome-color-manager: | |
importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
status: | Unknown → New |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #34 |
This bug was fixed in the package language-selector - 0.119
---------------
language-selector (0.119) trusty; urgency=medium
* data/language-
- Show in both unity-control-
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:07:58 +1300
Changed in language-selector (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #35 |
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu8
---------------
nautilus (1:3.8.2-0ubuntu8) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/
- Fix uninitialized variable
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:58:05 +1300
Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #36 |
This bug was fixed in the package software-properties - 0.92.32
---------------
software-properties (0.92.32) trusty; urgency=low
* data/software-
- Show in both GNOME control center and Unity control center (LP: #1257505)
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:44:57 +1300
Changed in software-properties (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in gnome-color-manager: | |
status: | New → Incomplete |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in gthumb: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #37 |
This bug was fixed in the package gthumb - 3:3.2.6-1ubuntu2
---------------
gthumb (3:3.2.6-1ubuntu2) trusty; urgency=medium
* No-change rebuild for libwebp transition
-- Iain Lane <email address hidden> Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:18:09 +0000
Changed in gthumb (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #38 |
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-bluetooth - 0.0.6+14.
---------------
indicator-bluetooth (0.0.6+
[ Charles Kerr ]
* Gets us a little closer to the spec in two ways: 1. Indicator
Visibility On the desktop, the indicator's header icon is visible
whenever a default adapter is available (whether the adapter is
powered or not) and the user's preference settings call for a
visible Bluetooth indicator. On the phone, the indicator's header
icon is visible whenever a default adapter is available *and* the
adapter is powered. 2. Header Icon If Bluetooth is off, the header
icon now uses the "bluetooth-
now uses the "bluetooth-active" icon. If Bluetooth is on and has a
connected device, it now uses the "bluetooth-paired" icon. (LP:
#1126108)
* Switching DBus service to an Upstart Job.
[ Robert Ancell ]
* Use unity-control-
[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 79
-- Ubuntu daily release <email address hidden> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:59:56 +0000
Changed in indicator-bluetooth (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #39 |
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-datetime - 13.10.0+
---------------
indicator-datetime (13.10.
[ Robert Ancell ]
* Support both gnome-control-
#1257505)
* Run the unity-control-
panel to just "datetime".
[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 294
-- Ubuntu daily release <email address hidden> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:00:08 +0000
Changed in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #40 |
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-sound - 12.10.2+
---------------
indicator-sound (12.10.
[ Robert Ancell ]
* Use unity-control-
[ Ted Gould ]
* Own the server capabilities so we clean it up.
[ Lars Uebernickel ]
* Don't write 'interested-
IndicatorSo
players desktop ids into a MediaPlayerList, which emits "player-
added" every time a player is added. This patch makes the service
keep track of whether players are added because it is syncing the
key or when a player appeared on the bus. .
[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 408
-- Ubuntu daily release <email address hidden> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:00:18 +0000
Changed in indicator-sound (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #41 |
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-power - 12.10.6+
---------------
indicator-power (12.10.
[ Robert Ancell ]
* Use unity-control-
[ Simon Steinbeiß ]
* Run xfce-powermanag
[ Lars Uebernickel ]
* gcov.m4: add 1.10 to the lcov version list.
* Run xfce-powermanag
[ Calum Lind ]
* From bug 1255655: "focus[es] the correct tab upon opening gnome-
power-
#1255655)
[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 222
-- Ubuntu daily release <email address hidden> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:59:48 +0000
Changed in indicator-power (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #42 |
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-session - 12.10.5+
---------------
indicator-session (12.10.
[ Robert Ancell ]
* Recommend yelp, gnome-control-
since we try and launch these applications.
* Use username as label if the real name is empty or whitespace. (LP:
#872908)
* Use unity-control-
[ Sebastien Bacher ]
* clean out the extra-sessions directory, it's a leftover.
* drop unused cmake file, it refears to geary and doesn't seem useful
there.
[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 426
-- Ubuntu daily release <email address hidden> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:02:01 +0000
Changed in indicator-session (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #43 |
This bug was fixed in the package activity-
---------------
activity-
* debian/
- Support unity-control-
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:37:11 +1300
Changed in activity-log-manager (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #44 |
This bug was fixed in the package landscape-client - 13.07.3-0ubuntu2
---------------
landscape-client (13.07.3-0ubuntu2) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/
- Show in both GNOME control center and Unity control center (LP: #1257505)
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:44:27 +1300
Changed in landscape-client (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in unity (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Triaged |
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #45 |
Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #46 |
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntuone-
---------------
ubuntuone-
* debian/
- Show in both GNOME control center and Unity control center (LP: #1257505)
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:35:09 +1300
Changed in ubuntuone-control-panel (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #47 |
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-media - 3.4.0-1ubuntu2
---------------
gnome-media (3.4.0-1ubuntu2) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/
- Use Unity control center in Unity (LP: #1257505)
* debian/
- Obsoleted by 04_unity_
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:01:19 +1300
Changed in gnome-media (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
tags: | added: patch |
Changed in empathy (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Triaged |
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #48 |
Compiz and unity are linked since they install files into /usr/share/
We need to get them to install keybindings into both and/or get u-c-c to read from the old location as a workaround.
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #49 |
This bug was fixed in the package webaccounts-
---------------
webaccounts-
* debian/control:
- Work with just unity-control-
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:01:40 +1300
Changed in webaccounts-browser-extension (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Chad Miller (cmiller) |
Changed in eog: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Released |
Changed in unity (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
Changed in empathy: | |
importance: | Unknown → Medium |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in empathy: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) wrote : | #50 |
I think gnome-control-
Changed in gnome-control-center-signon (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Alberto Mardegan (mardy) wrote : | #51 |
Yep, gnome-control-
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #52 |
This bug was fixed in the package empathy - 3.8.6-0ubuntu5
---------------
empathy (3.8.6-0ubuntu5) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/
* debian/
- Launch new unity-control-
-- Robert Ancell <email address hidden> Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:23:27 +1300
Changed in empathy (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in unity (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Changed in unity: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in gnome-media: | |
status: | New → Expired |
Olivier Tilloy (osomon) wrote : | #53 |
Not relevant any longer.
Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Chad Miller (cmiller) → nobody |
status: | In Progress → Won't Fix |
Fully agree on splitting the thing. One question, though: what do you think about installing the binaries in a different location (or with a different name), and have /usr/bin/ gnome-control- center as a shell script that checks if we are running under unity (is that DESKTOP_ SESSION= ubuntu? ) and execs unity-control- center in that case, and the gnome-control- center in all the others?
That way, we might be able to reduce the number of affected packages.