Activity log for bug #1010579

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2012-06-08 17:22:19 Duncan McGreggor bug added bug
2012-06-08 17:22:58 Duncan McGreggor bug added subscriber DreamCompute Team
2012-06-08 22:30:42 Duncan McGreggor description When checking glance for a bug I found in a running instance (see bug #1010560), I ran nox against the unit tests and was surprised to find that all the unit tests passed. I then ran the same unit tests using nosetests, and the unit test that I had expected to fail, did. This might be as simple as tox setting environments up that nosetests doesn't use. Or it could be more insidious. Regardless, probably something that should be looked into ;-) When checking glance for a bug I found in a running instance (see bug #1010560), I ran tox against the unit tests and was surprised to find that all the unit tests passed. I then ran the same unit tests using nosetests, and the unit test that I had expected to fail, did. This might be as simple as tox setting environments up that nosetests doesn't use. Or it could be more insidious. Regardless, probably something that should be looked into ;-)
2012-06-08 22:30:50 Duncan McGreggor summary nox and nosetests not showing consistent results tox and nosetests not showing consistent results
2012-06-20 21:36:23 Brian Waldon glance: status New Incomplete
2012-07-12 17:14:29 Brian Waldon glance: status Incomplete Won't Fix