[TestImpact] Need to cover by test deployment radosgw without it usage by os services

Bug #1546476 reported by Tatyanka on 2016-02-17
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Fuel for OpenStack
Egor Kotko
Nastya Urlapova

Bug Description

Next commit was merged into fuel-web:

So we need to cover by test next scenario:
1. Deploy cluster with controllers, compute, ceph-osd nodes
2. In cluster attribute leave default storage data for services, but enable radosgw
3. Deploy cluster
4. Verify that services are using default storages
5. Verify that radosgw works fine as a separate service

Changed in fuel:
status: New → Confirmed
Egor Kotko (ykotko) on 2016-03-18
Changed in fuel:
assignee: Fuel QA Team (fuel-qa) → Egor Kotko (ykotko)
Egor Kotko (ykotko) wrote :

Waiting for fix:
In current state the changes were only on UI, endpoints were not corrected.

summary: - Need to cover by test deployment radosgw without it usage by os
- services
+ [TestImpact] Need to cover by test deployment radosgw without it usage
+ by os services

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/304490

Changed in fuel:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Changed in fuel:
milestone: 9.0 → 10.0

Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/304490
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/fuel-qa/commit/?id=0308d54e3c29d29869615300f3141ade91ec4e9f
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master

commit 0308d54e3c29d29869615300f3141ade91ec4e9f
Author: Egor Kotko <email address hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 12 11:53:29 2016 +0200

    Deployment radosgw without it usage by os services

    Add test on covering case with usage RadosGW
    and default storages

    Change-Id: I512c7911c37d7c9b22f0c7a93279e5195042ab18
    Closes-bug: #1546476

Changed in fuel:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed

Change abandoned by Fuel DevOps Robot (<email address hidden>) on branch: stable/mitaka
Review: https://review.openstack.org/321820
Reason: This review is > 4 weeks without comment, and failed Jenkins the last time it was checked. We are abandoning this for now. Feel free to reactivate the review by pressing the restore button and leaving a 'recheck' comment to get fresh test results.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers