[Update] Volume can not be created / listed after patching

Bug #1356942 reported by Tatyanka
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Mirantis OpenStack
Fix Committed
High
Tatyanka

Bug Description

Steps to reproduce:
1. Deploy HA env on Centos with nova and cinder (5.0-26-2014.1). Run ostf to be sure that os works
2. Upgrade master node to next version({"build_id": "2014-08-14_12-04-35", "ostf_sha": "d2a894d228c1f3c22595a77f04b1e00d09d8e463", "build_number": "437", "auth_required": true, "api": "1.0", "nailgun_sha": "b5bdd19c2dbeb26ce3bd88270d09f5e7541a3aea", "production": "docker", "fuelmain_sha": "9f327045cdd72d406d89063393a499635be5e3d4", "astute_sha": "b52910642d6de941444901b0f20e95ebbcb2b2e9", "feature_groups": ["mirantis"], "release": "5.1", "fuellib_sha": "4b085bfbf7be973f0aa29d9d5e4f3ebd5bf789a1"})

3. Run environmnet update to release 5.0.2-2014.1.1
4. Run ostf

Expected result:
OSTF tests are passed

Actual result:
Volume service is not operational . I can not retrieve volume limits. volume list, can not create volume
http://paste.openstack.org/show/95064/

ostf for volumes ffailed too.
controller -> node 16

Revision history for this message
Tatyanka (tatyana-leontovich) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Vladimir Kuklin (vkuklin) wrote :

might be fixed by oslo.messaging patch

Changed in fuel:
status: New → Confirmed
tags: added: messaging oslo
Changed in fuel:
assignee: Igor Kalnitsky (ikalnitsky) → MOS Cinder (mos-cinder)
Revision history for this message
Ivan Kolodyazhny (e0ne) wrote :

Duplicate to bug #1355792

Revision history for this message
Tatyanka (tatyana-leontovich) wrote :

Reproduced from time to time

tags: added: cinder
Changed in fuel:
assignee: MOS Cinder (mos-cinder) → MOS Oslo (mos-oslo)
Revision history for this message
Ivan Kolodyazhny (e0ne) wrote :

Cinder failed to connect to RabbitMQ. It's a oslo.messaging bug

affects: fuel → mos
Changed in mos:
milestone: 5.1 → none
Ivan Kolodyazhny (e0ne)
Changed in mos:
milestone: none → 5.1
no longer affects: mos/5.0.x
Changed in mos:
milestone: 5.1 → 5.0.2
Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

Tatyana, please provide us an environment with repro. We need to diagnose the problem with rabbit. Once you get it, ping me and I will find people who can investigate.

Revision history for this message
Tatyanka (tatyana-leontovich) wrote :

I ping you, but you are like me :) Ivan K looked at the 2 env with such problems. Is it enaught?

Revision history for this message
Tatyanka (tatyana-leontovich) wrote :

I've updateed python-ciner client on controller - restart cinder-api and cinder scheduler - volumes successfully listed/ created/attached

Revision history for this message
Tatyanka (tatyana-leontovich) wrote :

So I belive this issue related to the https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1359705

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

Talked with Tatyana and Sergey Melikyan. We think that fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1356942 should fix that problem as well. Need to try reproduce that issue once 1356942 is fixed.

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

Oops, just noticed I gave link to the wrong bug. We actually think that fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1359705 should fix current problem.

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

The fix to bug 1359705 will be in ISO starting from build #487. Tatyana, please reverify bug on that ISO.

Changed in mos:
assignee: MOS Oslo (mos-oslo) → Tatyana (tatyana-leontovich)
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Tatyanka (tatyana-leontovich) wrote :

Hey :) if you need issue verification, you should use fix commited :)

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

Tatyana, ok, did it

Changed in mos:
status: Incomplete → Opinion
status: Opinion → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

The #487 does not contain the fix. I misunderstood 5.1 upgrade tarball build sequence. I will post here 5.1 build number which includes the fix once it is made.

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Mescheryakov (dmitrymex) wrote :

Ok, if my estimation is right, build #491 must have the fix.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.