| 2006-03-31 17:42:25 |
Étienne BERSAC |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2006-04-02 14:47:06 |
Sebastien Bacher |
epiphany-browser: status |
Unconfirmed |
Needs Info |
|
| 2006-04-02 14:47:06 |
Sebastien Bacher |
epiphany-browser: assignee |
|
desktop-bugs |
|
| 2006-04-02 14:47:06 |
Sebastien Bacher |
epiphany-browser: statusexplanation |
|
Thanks for your bug. What version of Ubuntu do you use? What do you call an element? An toolbar button? An HTML element? The tooltips on GTK widgets are placed to the screen without any issue on my dapper installation (aligned to the border as required), maybe you could do a screenshot of your issue? |
|
| 2006-04-02 15:15:38 |
Étienne BERSAC |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'epiphany-tooltip.png' (Screenshot) |
| 2006-04-02 15:29:52 |
Sebastien Bacher |
epiphany-browser: status |
Needs Info |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-04-02 15:29:52 |
Sebastien Bacher |
epiphany-browser: assignee |
desktop-bugs |
ijackson |
|
| 2006-04-02 15:29:52 |
Sebastien Bacher |
epiphany-browser: statusexplanation |
Thanks for your bug. What version of Ubuntu do you use? What do you call an element? An toolbar button? An HTML element? The tooltips on GTK widgets are placed to the screen without any issue on my dapper installation (aligned to the border as required), maybe you could do a screenshot of your issue? |
Thank you for the screenshot. That's known upstream as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129456, which is a gtkmozembed issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233371
Reassigning to firefox |
|
| 2006-04-02 15:30:18 |
Sebastien Bacher |
bug |
|
|
assigned to firefox (upstream) |
| 2006-04-04 10:46:20 |
Ian Jackson |
firefox: status |
Confirmed |
Rejected |
|
| 2006-04-04 10:46:20 |
Ian Jackson |
firefox: statusexplanation |
Thank you for the screenshot. That's known upstream as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129456, which is a gtkmozembed issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233371
Reassigning to firefox |
Thanks to Sebastian for finding the upstream bug.
I think this issue should be dealt with upstream; we don't have the resources to develop or maintain an appropriate patch.
So I am setting this bug to Rejected (LP assure me that this is the right status even though I agree with the complaint).
|
|
| 2006-06-15 06:54:09 |
Bug Watch Updater |
firefox: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2008-01-09 14:18:29 |
Alexander Sack |
bug |
|
|
assigned to xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu) |
| 2008-01-09 14:18:42 |
Alexander Sack |
firefox: status |
Invalid |
Won't Fix |
|
| 2008-01-09 14:18:48 |
Alexander Sack |
firefox: assignee |
ijackson |
|
|
| 2008-01-09 14:19:22 |
Alexander Sack |
xulrunner-1.9: importance |
Undecided |
Medium |
|
| 2008-01-09 14:19:22 |
Alexander Sack |
xulrunner-1.9: status |
New |
Triaged |
|
| 2008-01-09 15:38:35 |
Alexander Sack |
xulrunner-1.9: status |
Triaged |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2008-02-13 18:35:06 |
Launchpad Janitor |
xulrunner-1.9: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2009-06-27 07:44:08 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:ubuntu/karmic/xulrunner-1.9 |
|
| 2010-05-26 21:19:15 |
c7d2f5c8667d26fffd5e7772d632c76d |
removed subscriber chpe |
|
|
|
| 2010-09-16 19:28:20 |
Mathieu Pillard |
removed subscriber Mathieu Pillard |
|
|
|
| 2010-09-18 10:55:23 |
Bug Watch Updater |
firefox: importance |
Unknown |
Medium |
|
| 2010-09-18 10:55:28 |
Bug Watch Updater |
bug watch added |
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129456 |
|
