Actually, hasn't Linux made about a 100% jump in marketshare over the past year or two? Obviously, that's something like 0.5% to 1%, but it's significant. Linux has never been big on the desktop... its big area of deployment has always been servers. Making it big on the desktop has always been something we knew would be a long and difficult battle. But, since the future of computing depends on it, it's one we're willing to take up. And I don't think anyone here is sad that Apple has been Microsoft's big contender, lately. Notice that the bug is titled "Microsoft has a majority market share," not "Linux does not have a majority market share." The whole problem, the bug, if you will, is the stunning _lack_ of competition in the desktop space. If Vista's implosion leads people both to Mac and Linux, that's all the better for competition, which is all the better for consumers. Besides, you must have noticed the surge in budget-priced PCs, laptop and desktop, natively running Linux, in the past year. Everyone wanted to get in the "cheap Linux PC" game. In Portland, the beautiful city which I hail from, we have a community recycling center that takes old PCs, refurbishes them, installs Ubuntu, and offers free tech support and classes, and gives the PCs to volunteers, schools, and local nonprofits. Only using Linux could we cheaply turn old, clunky computers into ones that are fresh, fast, and reliable. Linux's market share is always going to be infinitesimal if it requires people to install an entirely new operating system on top of the (clunky and bloated, but usable) one they already have, the one they think "just works." Now that Linux is showing its birth pangs as a default desktop platform, it's time for the Linux community to show its stuff, support the new users making the bold transition, and prove that Linux is ready for prime time... it's vital that "cheap Linux PCs" become a permanent presence in the desktop space and not merely a fad. That's why now is the time to be bold and aggressive, and not the time to think, "waaah, Microsoft's so big, we'll never beat them." And remember, Microsoft's market-strangling dominance is a utilitarian issue as well as a philosophical one. It not only limits choice and competition, but Microsoft's fear of open standards holds back innovation in technology in society in more ways than I could possibly count here. Also, nearly every computer in the world running an operating system for which security is a tacked-on afterthought is an enormous petri dish for horrifying new kinds of crime. So it's a real fight, and though we may be a slim minority now, it's worth it to hang on until Linux can mature into a serious competitor for Microsoft. Besides, as our marketshare continues to fluctuate in the niche range, Linux has been getting better and better. Five years ago, somebody new to Linux practically had to be a CS major to install and maintain a Linux system. Now, there's a decent chance that an Ubuntu Live CD will run right out of the box. Ubuntu does absolutely everything that your average user needs Windows for, and much, much more... before ever even installing any of the amazing plethora of free applications available with a few clicks of the mouse (and one--count it, one--password prompt). If you look at Linux's maturation, you'll notice another pattern... we're not _losing_ anybody. Once you've made the switch to the penguin, there's no going back because the difference is night and day. I'd say a slow crawl to more and more users, more and more marketshare, and a more and more robust operating system is good news all around. And now... we finally have our chance to strut our stuff on PCs that you can buy off the shelf. Now is the time for hope. Now is the time to congratulate Apple on its inroads, and now is the time to congratulate Microsoft on its twenty years of dominance that are slowly coming to an end. On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:43 AM, wyo