evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_html_set_blocking()

Bug #759820 reported by Loïc Alejandro
48
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evolution
Won't Fix
Critical
evolution (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: evolution

I was just reading some emails.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: evolution 2.30.3-1ubuntu7.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Apr 13 10:21:35 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
ProcCmdline: evolution
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7fb3f24ba8b7 <gtk_html_set_blocking+7>: mov %esi,0x2d0(%rax)
 PC (0x7fb3f24ba8b7) ok
 source "%esi" ok
 destination "0x2d0(%rax)" (0x000002d0) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: evolution
StacktraceTop:
 gtk_html_set_blocking () from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
 gtk_html_begin_full () from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
 ?? () from /usr/lib/evolution/2.30/libevolution-mail.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_html_set_blocking()
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Loïc Alejandro (loic-alejandro) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 gtk_html_set_blocking (html=0x2ded920, block=0)
 gtk_html_begin_full (html=0x2ded920,
 efh_format_timeout (m=0x3c97a30)
 g_timeout_dispatch (source=0x5673f80, callback=0,
 g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x1387ab0)

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt
Changed in evolution (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

it looks like bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644697 ; are you still able to reproduce this?

Changed in evolution (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

I've reopened an upstream bug and paste the backtrace there, if you want to follow up please subscribe to bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646885

Changed in evolution (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Triaged
visibility: private → public
Changed in evolution:
importance: Unknown → Critical
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Jörg Frings-Fürst (jff-de) wrote :

10.10 is not longer supported
change status to invalid

Changed in evolution (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Invalid
Changed in evolution:
status: New → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.