Sort direction for selection depth wrong when doing best-hold selection
Bug #2023338 reported by
Galen Charlton
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
3.10 |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
3.11 |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Due to a five-character error in commit 6b53189a9 that implemented custom best-hold selection sort orders, the sorting direction for the hold selection depth is ascending, not descending.
This is a mistake: the intention is that holds that have a more limited selection depth (i.e., have a higher value for action.
Changed in evergreen: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
description: | updated |
Changed in evergreen: | |
assignee: | nobody → Terran McCanna (tmccanna) |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I've pushed a branch to address this by inverting the selection_depth sort order in the data used to calculate the sort order for holds to test against a copy in hand:
https:/ /git.evergreen- ils.org/ ?p=working/ Evergreen. git;a=shortlog; h=refs/ heads/user/ miker/lp- 2023338- bhsso-selection _depth- fix