Stock authority control set should assert 148/448/548 relationships

[Galen Charlton]

For the stock "LoC" control set, the authority.control_set_authority_field table does not assert the relations between the 148/448/548 fields in the authority record and the corresponding "chronological_term" heading types.

With the advent of the patch for bug 2007351, this makes a difference: the Angular bib editor no longer knows how to look up chronological term authority records to link to bib 648 fields.

Quoting Mieke Stroo's comment on that bug:

  It seems that this patch disturbed the working of the 648-field. It worked perfectly before the patch was added. Now it has the same issue as the above mentioned fields in this bug report.

  This is a screenshot from our log:

  open-ils.pcrud 2023-03-20 11:26:02 [INFO:1712602:osrf_application.c:1075:16793079628061820] CALL: open-ils.pcrud open-ils.pcrud.search.acsbf.atomic "ANONYMOUS",{"tag":"648","authority_field":{"in":{"select":{"acsaf":["id"]},"from":"acsaf","where":{"heading_field":{"!=":null}}}}},{"flesh":1,"flesh_fields":{"acsbf":["authority_field"]}}

[Mackenzie Johnson (mtjohnsonupei)]

This is an aside to the issue, but while I recognize the need to ensure any given fresh install of EG asserts these relations by itself, hypothetically speaking I could manually update authority.control_set_authority_field with the appropriate authority.heading_field IDs as a local interim fix, could I not?