Record Bucket Export Has Different Options Than Batch Import/Export
Bug #1993014 reported by
Jennifer Pringle
This bug affects 3 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evergreen |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Evergreen 3.9
When exporting records via the Export option of the MARC Batch Import/Export there are four record format options - MARC21, UNIMARC, MARC XML, and Evergreen Record Entry.
When exporting records from within the Record Bucket interface there are two record format options - MARC XML and USMARC.
Ideally the two interfaces should have the same record format options for export.
As well the MARC Batch Export has a checkbox for "Include holdings in Bibliographic Records" while exporting via Record Buckets has a checkbox for "Include Items?" The two interfaces should use the same label for both checkboxes. My vote would be for "Include holdings in Bibliographic Records" in both interfaces.
Revision history for this message
| Christine Morgan (cmorgan-z) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in evergreen: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
To post a comment you must log in.
Confirmed on 3.9.1.