adding holdings to deleted bib should fail earlier

Bug #1943273 reported by Andrea Neiman
40
This bug affects 8 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evergreen
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Version 3.7.1 and possibly earlier (I have not looked at earlier versions)

Admittedly this is an edge case. But. A cataloger can retrieve a deleted bib record via the "retrieve by bib ID" search. The bib is styled as "deleted" but it is possible to miss this styling, as I did in a recent test system.

Even though the record is marked deleted, the button to add holdings (and all "add call numbers/items" action menu entries in the Holdings View tab) will happily open a new tab to add holdings and let you get all the way through creating a new holding, up to when you click save. Then nothing happens - the tab doesn't close and no visible error message is generated (though there is a console error message).

A couple potential solutions:

1) Style deleted bibs more "loudly"
2) Deactivate add holdings actions / buttons on deleted records
3) Show a user prompt to the effect of "you're trying to add holdings on a deleted record - please undelete the record and try again" (bonus points for a "undelete this record?" option in the prompt)

Revision history for this message
Elaine Hardy (ehardy) wrote :

Styling the deleted bibs more loudly would help in general. I often miss that a bib is deleted and have been debating opening a ticket about it.

#3 with the undelete option is my preference, however, any of the three options would be good.

Revision history for this message
Jennifer Pringle (jpringle-u) wrote :

+1 to louder styling (I think there used to be more red in the xul client)

I also like the idea of #3 with the option to undelete since if you go through and add an item you probably really do still want to use the record

Revision history for this message
Millissa (millissam) wrote :

Like the option of #3.

Revision history for this message
Joan Kranich (jkranich) wrote :

Option #3 would be helpful.

Revision history for this message
Jennifer Weston (jweston) wrote :

+1 to option #3 with the added option to undelete

Revision history for this message
Beth Willis (willis-a) wrote :

+1 to option #3. Note: I have confirmed that this issue affects version 3-6-4 as well.

Changed in evergreen:
status: New → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.