Add separate "update edit date / editor" fields for Vandelay merge profiles

Bug #1928258 reported by Bill Erickson
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evergreen
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Evergreen 3.7

In bug #1447746, it was resolved that a single field (vandelay.merge_profile.update_bib_source) would suffice for specifying when the source, editor, and edit_date should be updated on a bib record which is the target of a Vandelay merge/overlay. I propose we decouple them and add a new field to specify whether a merge profile updates editor data.

In our case, we have work flows where we want the editor info updated, but not the bib source.

For consistency, the SQL upgrade would apply a value to the new field matching the update_bib_source value for each profile.

Revision history for this message
Bill Erickson (berick) wrote :
tags: added: pull
tags: added: pullrequest
removed: pull
Revision history for this message
Christine Morgan (cmorgan-z) wrote :

Tested with both edit date and update source selected, both unselected, only edit date selected, and only update source selected. Update date and 901$s updated as expected. Thanks Bill!

I have tested this code and consent to signing off on it with my name,
Christine Morgan and my email address,
<email address hidden>.

tags: added: signedoff
Revision history for this message
Galen Charlton (gmc) wrote :

Pushed to master for inclusion in 3.8. Thanks, Bill and Christine!

Changed in evergreen:
assignee: Bill Erickson (berick) → Galen Charlton (gmc)
status: New → Fix Committed
assignee: Galen Charlton (gmc) → nobody
Changed in evergreen:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.