web client: update transfer language in item status
Bug #1789485 reported by
Andrea Neiman
This bug affects 5 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evergreen |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Master
3.1.4
3.0.10
As part of the work done on bug 1773417, the Holdings View action menu consolidated transfer options to read "Transfer Item to Previously Marked Destination" and "Transfer Volumes to Previously Marked Destination."
The action menu in Item Status still reads "Transfer Items to Previously Marked Library" and "Transfer Items to Previously Marked Volume". We should probably update this to match the behavior/language now in Holdings View.
| Changed in evergreen: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Kathy Lussier (klussier) |
| Changed in evergreen: | |
| assignee: | Kathy Lussier (klussier) → nobody |
Revision history for this message
| Janet Schrader (jschrader) wrote | #1 |
| tags: | removed: webstaffclient |
To post a comment you must log in.
Isn't there a distinction between "previously marked destination" and "previously marked library"? In Item Status it seems you have to mark a "library", not a bib record for transfer. If you change this label to "destination" will the code still work if you select a bib and not a library?
Coincidentally, I was just doing some transfers in holdings view and transferring to a different bib. I absolutely love the fact that I can transfer items belonging to multiple libraries to a different bib without having to select a library.
Janet