Web client: Mark Item Damaged function fails silently on in transit items, Xul client succeeds but leaves a hanging transit

Bug #1756441 reported by Michele Morgan on 2018-03-16
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evergreen
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

When an attempt is made to mark an In transit item Damaged in the web client, the action fails with no feedback.

When the same attempt is made in the xul client, that Mark Damaged action succeeds, but a row remains for the transit in the action.transit_copy table even though the status of the item has been changed to Damaged.

Below are log entries for the failure in the web client:

[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:32856:Circulate.pm:575:] circulator: pushing event ROUTE_ITEM
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:32856:Circulate.pm:561:] circulator: BAILING OUT
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:32856:Circulate.pm:287:] circulator: bailing out with events: ROUTE_ITEM
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:32856:CStoreEditor.pm:139:] editor[1|1] rolling back db session
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:32856:CStoreEditor.pm:139:] editor[1|1] request en-US open-ils.cstore.transaction.rollback []
open-ils.cstore 2018-03-16 15:58:45 [INFO:59333:osrf_app_session.c:1177:] [open-ils.cstore] sent 403 bytes of data to <email address hidden>/open-ils.circ_drone_at_localhost_32856
open-ils.cstore 2018-03-16 15:58:45 [INFO:59333:osrf_stack.c:163:] Message processing duration 0.000469
open-ils.cstore 2018-03-16 15:58:45 [INFO:59333:osrf_stack.c:163:] Message processing duration 0.000000
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:32856:Transport.pm:163:] Message processing duration: 0.333
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [INFO:59188:Circ.pm:1364:] try_checkin() received event: ROUTE_ITEM
[2018-03-16 15:58:45] open-ils.circ [WARN:59188:Circ.pm:1370:] try_checkin() un-successful checkin

John Amundson (jamundson) wrote :

Confirmed in 3.0.12ish.

I'll also note, since it is in a very similar vein, that in the XUL client, trying to mark an item In Transit as Missing fails with a pop-up stating it can be done.

However, in the web client, an item In Transit can be marked Missing, and its corresponding action.transit_Copy row is not cancelled.

Changed in evergreen:
status: New → Confirmed
Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) wrote :

I want to add that I am working on changes to the behavior of the Mark Item functionality that will likely address this bug. It looks like these changes will be ready for Evergreen 3.3. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1779467

I don't know if we want to mark this bug as a duplicate or not. Someone may come up with an alternate fix in the meantime.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers