EDI Default Cancel Reason for Baker & Taylor not included: Code 85
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
2.8 |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
2.9 |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
EG 2.8.4
I just recently figured out that the reason none of our EDI Cancellations were registering in our system is because the code that Baker & Taylor was sending back to us wasn't entered in the acq.cancel_reason.
Baker & Taylor uses code 85 when they cancel a line item immediately for our implementation.
Since it is a bit obscure to add these codes and it cannot be done from the staff client I wonder if it would be appropriate to add this one to the base install, so if anyone else starts using EDI with B&T this code wouldn't need to be added manually. And add it to existing installs if it hasn't already been added.
And by obscure I just mean that the row ID for the entry needs to be 1200+<code> to be used by the EDI subsystem. I don't see any mention of that in the EDI setup docs in the official 2.8 docs.
Can someone else that uses EDI with B&T let me know if you also use cancel code 85 please.
Thanks
Josh
Changed in evergreen: | |
assignee: | nobody → Josh Stompro (u-launchpad-stompro-org) |
tags: | added: acq |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
EG 2.9.1
Hi Josh,
Several of our libraries order from B&T using EDI. In checking some of the ORDRSP files I can see that code 85 is being use for our implementation as well. I do not see code 85 (or row id 1285) in acq.cancel_reason either. I am no EDI expert but I would think that adding this to the base install would be appropriate.
Hope this helps,
Christine