Hi Mike, I did have this in the back of my mind when working on bug #1596595. It would be a trivial change to keep #1596595 synchronized, very similar to the changes applied to the current hold targeter in the branch for this bug. If we move forward with these, I'll create a version of bug #1596595 that sits atop this branch.
Hi Mike, I did have this in the back of my mind when working on bug #1596595. It would be a trivial change to keep #1596595 synchronized, very similar to the changes applied to the current hold targeter in the branch for this bug. If we move forward with these, I'll create a version of bug #1596595 that sits atop this branch.